Shear wave elastography demonstrates similar risk stratification performance to vibration-controlled transient elastography in FIB-4–based two-step algorithms for MASLD

BACKGROUND AIMS: The role of shear wave elastography (SWE) in two-step MASLD risk stratification remains unclear. We compared SWE with vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) using American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) algorithms. APPROACH RESULTS: Patients with MASLD who underwent both VCTE and SWE during the same session between 2019 and 2025 were included. Risk stratification was performed using AGA- and EASL-based two-step approaches. The primary endpoint was liver-related events (LRE). Among 2,817 patients, the AGA-SWE algorithm classified 2,196, 140, and 481 patients as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk, respectively. Using the AGA-SWE algorithm, both intermediate- and high-risk groups showed increased risks of LREs compared with the low-risk group (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 7.60 and 9.86, respectively). The EASL-SWE algorithm also stratified LRE risk relative to the low-risk group, with higher sHRs observed for the intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high-risk groups (sHR 2.99, 10.83, and 18.87, respectively). The integrated time-dependent area under the curve through 60 months was 0.770 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.709, 0.827) and 0.775 (95% CI: 0.712, 0.835) for AGA-SWE and AGA-VCTE, respectively, and 0.804 (95% CI: 0.753, 0.849) and 0.805 (95% CI: 0.750, 0.852) for EASL-SWE and EASL-VCTE, respectively, with no significant differences between SWE and VCTE in either algorithm. No significant net reclassification improvement was observed between SWE- and VCTE-based AGA algorithms. SWE and VCTE demonstrated a strong correlation (Spearman's ρ = 0.713, 95% CI: 0.691-0.735, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SWE-based two-step risk stratification showed similar predictive performance to VCTE-based models for predicting LREs in MASLD, although these findings do not establish formal equivalence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hepatology
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/hep.0000000000001841
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shear wave elastography demonstrates similar risk stratification performance to vibration-controlled transient elastography in FIB-4–based two-step algorithms for MASLD

Soon Woo Nam, Soon Kyu Lee, Jung Hyun Kwon, Sun Hong Yoo et al.
Hepatology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Shear wave elastography demonstrates similar risk stratification performance to vibration-controlled transient elastography in FIB-4–based two-step algorithms for MASLD

Soon Woo Nam, Soon Kyu Lee, Jung Hyun Kwon, Sun Hong Yoo, Si Hyun Bae, Jiwoon Yoon, Hyun Yang, Jaejun Lee
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS: The role of shear wave elastography (SWE) in two-step MASLD risk stratification remains unclear. We compared SWE with vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) using American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) algorithms. APPROACH RESULTS: Patients with MASLD who underwent both VCTE and SWE during the same session between 2019 and 2025 were included. Risk stratification was performed using AGA- and EASL-based two-step approaches. The primary endpoint was liver-related events (LRE). Among 2,817 patients, the AGA-SWE algorithm classified 2,196, 140, and 481 patients as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk, respectively. Using the AGA-SWE algorithm, both intermediate- and high-risk groups showed increased risks of LREs compared with the low-risk group (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 7.60 and 9.86, respectively). The EASL-SWE algorithm also stratified LRE risk relative to the low-risk group, with higher sHRs observed for the intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high-risk groups (sHR 2.99, 10.83, and 18.87, respectively). The integrated time-dependent area under the curve through 60 months was 0.770 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.709, 0.827) and 0.775 (95% CI: 0.712, 0.835) for AGA-SWE and AGA-VCTE, respectively, and 0.804 (95% CI: 0.753, 0.849) and 0.805 (95% CI: 0.750, 0.852) for EASL-SWE and EASL-VCTE, respectively, with no significant differences between SWE and VCTE in either algorithm. No significant net reclassification improvement was observed between SWE- and VCTE-based AGA algorithms. SWE and VCTE demonstrated a strong correlation (Spearman's ρ = 0.713, 95% CI: 0.691-0.735, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SWE-based two-step risk stratification showed similar predictive performance to VCTE-based models for predicting LREs in MASLD, although these findings do not establish formal equivalence.

Hepatology
St. Mary's Hospital (US), The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital (KR), St. Mary's Hospital (US), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.