Development and Initial Psychometric Validation of the Multidimensional Menopausal Burden Questionnaire (MMBQ-44) in a Sample of Romanian Women

Background/Objectives: Current menopause assessment instruments primarily evaluate vasomotor, somatic, and urogenital symptoms, with limited attention to oral, sensory, and integrated psychological domains. Evidence that oral tissues are estrogen-responsive suggests that oral symptoms may represent an important but underrecognized component of menopausal burden. This study aimed to develop and provide initial psychometric validation of the Multidimensional Menopausal Burden Questionnaire (MMBQ-44), a 44-item instrument integrating systemic, oral, and psychological symptoms. Methods: A cross-sectional validation study was conducted in 308 women aged 45–65 years (perimenopausal n = 66, menopausal n = 40, postmenopausal n = 202). The MMBQ-44 combined items from the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), Xerostomia Inventory (XI), Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14), and psychological measures derived from the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and HADS. Instrument development included expert review, cognitive interviewing, and field testing. Psychometric evaluation assessed item performance, internal consistency, factor structure, discriminant validity, and known-groups validity. Exploratory factor analysis used principal axis factoring with promax rotation, with factor retention determined by parallel analysis. Results: Internal consistency was good to excellent across domains (Cronbach’s α: 0.813–0.941; McDonald’s ω: 0.864–0.953). All corrected item–total correlations exceeded 0.30. The questionnaire showed strong factorability (KMO = 0.931; Bartlett’s χ2 = 9006.2, p < 0.001). Parallel analysis identified four factors explaining 48.6% of total variance. Psychological and OHIP domains emerged clearly, whereas several MRS and XI items cross-loaded onto related factors. Most HTMT ratios were below 0.85, supporting discriminant validity. Floor effects were observed for OHIP (37.0%) and XI (23.4%). Known-groups validity was modest, with OHIP scores differing significantly across menopausal stages. Conclusions: The MMBQ-44 demonstrates strong reliability and acceptable construct validity as an integrative screening instrument for menopausal burden. Further confirmatory studies and refinement of oral symptom items are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16162574
Primary Topic
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Initial Psychometric Validation of the Multidimensional Menopausal Burden Questionnaire (MMBQ-44) in a Sample of Romanian Women

Angela Dragomir, Ruxandra Cristina Marin, Alina Ramona Buzatu, Andreea Anda Alexa et al.
Diagnostics
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
article

Development and Initial Psychometric Validation of the Multidimensional Menopausal Burden Questionnaire (MMBQ-44) in a Sample of Romanian Women

Angela Dragomir, Ruxandra Cristina Marin, Alina Ramona Buzatu, Andreea Anda Alexa, Călin Muntean, Anca Marcu, Iulia Najette Crintea, Radu Dumitru Moleriu, Marilena Dinuți, Teodora Piroș
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Current menopause assessment instruments primarily evaluate vasomotor, somatic, and urogenital symptoms, with limited attention to oral, sensory, and integrated psychological domains. Evidence that oral tissues are estrogen-responsive suggests that oral symptoms may represent an important but underrecognized component of menopausal burden. This study aimed to develop and provide initial psychometric validation of the Multidimensional Menopausal Burden Questionnaire (MMBQ-44), a 44-item instrument integrating systemic, oral, and psychological symptoms. Methods: A cross-sectional validation study was conducted in 308 women aged 45–65 years (perimenopausal n = 66, menopausal n = 40, postmenopausal n = 202). The MMBQ-44 combined items from the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), Xerostomia Inventory (XI), Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14), and psychological measures derived from the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and HADS. Instrument development included expert review, cognitive interviewing, and field testing. Psychometric evaluation assessed item performance, internal consistency, factor structure, discriminant validity, and known-groups validity. Exploratory factor analysis used principal axis factoring with promax rotation, with factor retention determined by parallel analysis. Results: Internal consistency was good to excellent across domains (Cronbach’s α: 0.813–0.941; McDonald’s ω: 0.864–0.953). All corrected item–total correlations exceeded 0.30. The questionnaire showed strong factorability (KMO = 0.931; Bartlett’s χ2 = 9006.2, p < 0.001). Parallel analysis identified four factors explaining 48.6% of total variance. Psychological and OHIP domains emerged clearly, whereas several MRS and XI items cross-loaded onto related factors. Most HTMT ratios were below 0.85, supporting discriminant validity. Floor effects were observed for OHIP (37.0%) and XI (23.4%). Known-groups validity was modest, with OHIP scores differing significantly across menopausal stages. Conclusions: The MMBQ-44 demonstrates strong reliability and acceptable construct validity as an integrative screening instrument for menopausal burden. Further confirmatory studies and refinement of oral symptom items are warranted.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(16)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), University of Oradea (RO), Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.