The Relationships Between Rodent Control Efforts, Abundance, Damage, and Outcomes

Rodents cause damage to agricultural crops and biodiversity. Rodent control occurs to reduce damage and ideally increase crop yield and biodiversity. So, do control efforts increase outcomes, such as yield? The sequence of relationships between control, rodents, damage, and outcomes is examined for empirical evidence of each. Simple, general models of relationships are described and elaborated for control effort-outcome relationships. Two models, the logarithmic and inverse models, assume diminishing returns and accelerated losses, and one model, the linear model, assumes no diminishing returns and no accelerated losses. The results show there are many studies of rodent control and rodent damage; however, few empirical studies of relationships between rodent control efforts and outcomes, such as crop yield. The rodent control effort-outcome relationship should be estimated more frequently, ideally using randomized regression-design experiments and diminishing returns and accelerated losses evaluated as part of causal inference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrative Zoology
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.70171
Primary Topic
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationships Between Rodent Control Efforts, Abundance, Damage, and Outcomes

Jim Hone
Integrative Zoology
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
article

The Relationships Between Rodent Control Efforts, Abundance, Damage, and Outcomes

Jim Hone
article en

Abstract

Rodents cause damage to agricultural crops and biodiversity. Rodent control occurs to reduce damage and ideally increase crop yield and biodiversity. So, do control efforts increase outcomes, such as yield? The sequence of relationships between control, rodents, damage, and outcomes is examined for empirical evidence of each. Simple, general models of relationships are described and elaborated for control effort-outcome relationships. Two models, the logarithmic and inverse models, assume diminishing returns and accelerated losses, and one model, the linear model, assumes no diminishing returns and no accelerated losses. The results show there are many studies of rodent control and rodent damage; however, few empirical studies of relationships between rodent control efforts and outcomes, such as crop yield. The rodent control effort-outcome relationship should be estimated more frequently, ideally using randomized regression-design experiments and diminishing returns and accelerated losses evaluated as part of causal inference.

Integrative Zoology
University of Canberra (AU)
University of Canberra
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Relationships Between Rodent Control Efforts, Abundance, Damage, and Outcomes — Jim Hone · Integrative Zoology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS