Quantifying situational, demographic, and regional factors associated with seat belt use in a national sample of connected vehicle customers

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the relative strength of association of situational (e.g., trip distance), demographic (e.g., age), and regional (e.g., rurality) factors with trip-level seat belt use in a diverse sample of adult drivers. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of baseline data from a nationwide trial that used vehicle telematics to unobtrusively measure buckling behavior. Data were collected in 2022 and included 1,000 participants residing in 48 U.S. states with 129,494 single-segment driving trips. Logistic mixed-effect regression quantified variance explained. RESULTS: Participant age ranged from 18 to 88 (mean = 51.3); 59.6% were male, 40.4% female; 84.4% identified as white, 9.4% as Black, and 6.2% as another race. Mean (SD) seat belt use was 83.6% (19.1%) of trips. In the primary analysis, situational factors explained 29.9% of the variability in seat belt use, whereas demographic and regional factors explained only 0.4% and <0.1%, respectively; 23.2% was attributable to individual differences not explained by fixed factors. Drivers were more likely to buckle on longer-distance trips, but unexpectedly less likely to buckle on trips with greater average speed. Drivers buckled less after sunset and late at night. None of the demographic or regional factors significantly predicted buckling. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of variance explained are sample-dependent, and the present sample underrepresented certain groups (ages 18-24, races other than white). Further research is needed with more representative samples. Nevertheless, reorienting away from demographic and regional factors, which combined explained <0.5% of the variance in buckling behavior in the present sample, and toward individuals and situations for which buckling is less common, which combined explained >50%, may prove fruitful for researchers and seat belt campaigns. Findings point to a need to encourage buckling on drives that are short, high-speed, or after sundown.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Traffic Injury Prevention
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2026.2709748
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying situational, demographic, and regional factors associated with seat belt use in a national sample of connected vehicle customers

Ruiqi Yan, Catherine C. McDonald, Jeffrey P. Ebert, Kelsey Bartolozzi et al.
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Quantifying situational, demographic, and regional factors associated with seat belt use in a national sample of connected vehicle customers

Ruiqi Yan, Catherine C. McDonald, Jeffrey P. Ebert, Kelsey Bartolozzi, M. Kit Delgado, Yingying Lu, Michael O. Harhay
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the relative strength of association of situational (e.g., trip distance), demographic (e.g., age), and regional (e.g., rurality) factors with trip-level seat belt use in a diverse sample of adult drivers. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of baseline data from a nationwide trial that used vehicle telematics to unobtrusively measure buckling behavior. Data were collected in 2022 and included 1,000 participants residing in 48 U.S. states with 129,494 single-segment driving trips. Logistic mixed-effect regression quantified variance explained. RESULTS: Participant age ranged from 18 to 88 (mean = 51.3); 59.6% were male, 40.4% female; 84.4% identified as white, 9.4% as Black, and 6.2% as another race. Mean (SD) seat belt use was 83.6% (19.1%) of trips. In the primary analysis, situational factors explained 29.9% of the variability in seat belt use, whereas demographic and regional factors explained only 0.4% and <0.1%, respectively; 23.2% was attributable to individual differences not explained by fixed factors. Drivers were more likely to buckle on longer-distance trips, but unexpectedly less likely to buckle on trips with greater average speed. Drivers buckled less after sunset and late at night. None of the demographic or regional factors significantly predicted buckling. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of variance explained are sample-dependent, and the present sample underrepresented certain groups (ages 18-24, races other than white). Further research is needed with more representative samples. Nevertheless, reorienting away from demographic and regional factors, which combined explained <0.5% of the variance in buckling behavior in the present sample, and toward individuals and situations for which buckling is less common, which combined explained >50%, may prove fruitful for researchers and seat belt campaigns. Findings point to a need to encourage buckling on drives that are short, high-speed, or after sundown.

Traffic Injury Prevention
General Motors (United States) (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.