An Engineering Definition of AGI: Complex-Project Closed-Loop Capability as an Assessment Criterion

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has long lacked a stable and operational definition. Existing definitions variously emphasize human-like behavior, subjective mental states, broad cognitive capability, human-level performance, economic value, or social impact, yet they still leave an engineering question unresolved: when does AI transition from a high-capability tool to a system capable of independently assuming responsibility for complex productive work? This paper shifts the unit of assessment from local capabilities and individual tasks to complex-project closed-loop capability, and proposes a working definition of engineering AGI: given an objective, available resources, safety boundaries, and initial context, an AI system can, without continuous human steering, reliably complete most typical complex projects that would otherwise require sustained collaboration by ordinary human teams, while producing verifiable deliverables. This definition does not attempt to resolve philosophical questions such as consciousness or subjective experience. Instead, it provides a system-level assessment framework for AI engineering, knowledge-work automation, and productivity assessment that supports further operationalization, cross-system comparison, and progressive approximation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21927624
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

An Engineering Definition of AGI: Complex-Project Closed-Loop Capability as an Assessment Criterion

明 刘
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
preprint

An Engineering Definition of AGI: Complex-Project Closed-Loop Capability as an Assessment Criterion

明 刘
preprint en

Abstract

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has long lacked a stable and operational definition. Existing definitions variously emphasize human-like behavior, subjective mental states, broad cognitive capability, human-level performance, economic value, or social impact, yet they still leave an engineering question unresolved: when does AI transition from a high-capability tool to a system capable of independently assuming responsibility for complex productive work? This paper shifts the unit of assessment from local capabilities and individual tasks to complex-project closed-loop capability, and proposes a working definition of engineering AGI: given an objective, available resources, safety boundaries, and initial context, an AI system can, without continuous human steering, reliably complete most typical complex projects that would otherwise require sustained collaboration by ordinary human teams, while producing verifiable deliverables. This definition does not attempt to resolve philosophical questions such as consciousness or subjective experience. Instead, it provides a system-level assessment framework for AI engineering, knowledge-work automation, and productivity assessment that supports further operationalization, cross-system comparison, and progressive approximation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Decent work and economic growth
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Engineering Definition of AGI: Complex-Project Closed-Loop Capability as an Assessment Criterion — 明 刘 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS