Conative inference as a mechanism of allostatic resilience: wanting to be and being to want

Stability, mental stability in particular, is necessary for adaptive functioning. Dynamical systems existing in a changing environment must adapt to it by resolving the dialectical tension between stability and flexibility, which is captured in the concept of resilience. Allostasis is considered as a systemic mechanism of resilience and has recently been framed in terms of active inference, a theory of sentient behavior. Allostatic systems are thought to operate on the principle of self-organized criticality, which is related to free energy minimization, the central tenet of active inference theory. Based on this framework, I propose a functional brain hierarchy that supports allostasis. In it, desire and affect, framed in terms of affective inference, serve to integrate and mediate mutual constraints between cognitive and physiological homeostases. I further suggest that as allostatic organisms evolve into affective ones, they develop into conative agents, whose conation regulates their affective dynamics. At the top of this regulatory hierarchy, I propose raw desire, a domain-general global desire for positive affect (or to simply feel better). This functional hierarchy makes the raw desire-affective charge regulatory loop a core mechanism of allostasis and mental stability. It also implies an inherent vulnerability of conative organisms to affective dysregulation. Accordingly, much of psychopathology may be considered as compromised conative inference, which could be a target for therapeutic intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-026-01485-3
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conative inference as a mechanism of allostatic resilience: wanting to be and being to want

Valery Krupnik
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

Conative inference as a mechanism of allostatic resilience: wanting to be and being to want

Valery Krupnik
article en

Abstract

Stability, mental stability in particular, is necessary for adaptive functioning. Dynamical systems existing in a changing environment must adapt to it by resolving the dialectical tension between stability and flexibility, which is captured in the concept of resilience. Allostasis is considered as a systemic mechanism of resilience and has recently been framed in terms of active inference, a theory of sentient behavior. Allostatic systems are thought to operate on the principle of self-organized criticality, which is related to free energy minimization, the central tenet of active inference theory. Based on this framework, I propose a functional brain hierarchy that supports allostasis. In it, desire and affect, framed in terms of affective inference, serve to integrate and mediate mutual constraints between cognitive and physiological homeostases. I further suggest that as allostatic organisms evolve into affective ones, they develop into conative agents, whose conation regulates their affective dynamics. At the top of this regulatory hierarchy, I propose raw desire, a domain-general global desire for positive affect (or to simply feel better). This functional hierarchy makes the raw desire-affective charge regulatory loop a core mechanism of allostasis and mental stability. It also implies an inherent vulnerability of conative organisms to affective dysregulation. Accordingly, much of psychopathology may be considered as compromised conative inference, which could be a target for therapeutic intervention.

Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
Naval Hospital Pensacola (US)
Naval Medical Center San Diego
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.