Exploring the relationship between external shame and perceived social rank in people who hear voices

OBJECTIVES: People who hear voices commonly experience high levels of shame. This study builds on evolutionary theories by investigating how feelings of shame are associated with the nature of the voice-person relationship. Researchers aim to understand whether increased feelings of external shame are associated with voice-hearers adopting a subordinating relationship to the voice(s), assigning the voice a higher social rank. The research also explored whether voice content, operationalized as the ways in which voices address the person (e.g. making requests, demands, forbidding actions, asking questions), is associated with this relationship as a potential mediator. METHODS: The study implements a cross-sectional design, using an online survey. Fifty-six voice-hearers completed a series of questionnaires related to voice-hearing, external shame and perceived social rank, along with additional control variables online or via the telephone. RESULTS: After controlling for confounders, external shame was significantly associated with perceived social rank, with higher levels of external shame corresponding to a lower perception of one's own social rank compared with the voice. Results did not suggest that voice content mediates this relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Findings align with evolutionary theories on shame in voice-hearers and build on previous research by offering greater specificity in understanding the relationship between external shame and social rank, suggesting that interventions targeting external shame may be relevant, while future longitudinal research is needed to clarify the direction of the association. However, the cross-sectional study design precludes conclusions about directionality or causality, and self-selecting recruitment may limit the generalizability of results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.70092
Primary Topic
Emotions and Moral Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the relationship between external shame and perceived social rank in people who hear voices

Craig Steel, Emmeline Goodby, Amy Lewins, Charlotte Thomas‐Carmichael
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Emotions and Moral Behavior
article

Exploring the relationship between external shame and perceived social rank in people who hear voices

Craig Steel, Emmeline Goodby, Amy Lewins, Charlotte Thomas‐Carmichael
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: People who hear voices commonly experience high levels of shame. This study builds on evolutionary theories by investigating how feelings of shame are associated with the nature of the voice-person relationship. Researchers aim to understand whether increased feelings of external shame are associated with voice-hearers adopting a subordinating relationship to the voice(s), assigning the voice a higher social rank. The research also explored whether voice content, operationalized as the ways in which voices address the person (e.g. making requests, demands, forbidding actions, asking questions), is associated with this relationship as a potential mediator. METHODS: The study implements a cross-sectional design, using an online survey. Fifty-six voice-hearers completed a series of questionnaires related to voice-hearing, external shame and perceived social rank, along with additional control variables online or via the telephone. RESULTS: After controlling for confounders, external shame was significantly associated with perceived social rank, with higher levels of external shame corresponding to a lower perception of one's own social rank compared with the voice. Results did not suggest that voice content mediates this relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Findings align with evolutionary theories on shame in voice-hearers and build on previous research by offering greater specificity in understanding the relationship between external shame and social rank, suggesting that interventions targeting external shame may be relevant, while future longitudinal research is needed to clarify the direction of the association. However, the cross-sectional study design precludes conclusions about directionality or causality, and self-selecting recruitment may limit the generalizability of results.

British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Warneford Hospital (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Emotions and Moral Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.