Emergency Psychiatric Evaluation of People Under Arrest: Recommendations From a Participatory Policymaking Symposium
Columbia University's Justice-Involved Behavioral Health Workgroup held a symposium about emergency psychiatric evaluations of people under arrest, using a participatory policymaking approach. Four principles emerged to guide emergency departments when developing patient-centered policies: psychiatric evaluation of patients under arrest should be based on clinical presentation, not custody status; peer specialists should be employed in psychiatric emergency settings; use of restraints by law enforcement should be limited during emergency psychiatric care; and private space should be allocated for psychiatric evaluations.
Authors
- Michael T. Compton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6835-2502)
- Katherine Elkington (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7349-7191)
- Leah G. Pope
- James Holmes
- Stephen Matthews
- Elizabeth Ford
- Luis Lopez
Institutions
- Vera Institute of Justice (US)
- Community Connections (US)
- New York State Psychiatric Institute
- Columbia University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Psychiatric Services
- Published
- 2026-08-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20250705
- Primary Topic
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00