Immigrant Parents’ Beliefs About the U.S. Child Welfare System: The Role of Information Sources and Familiarity

Immigrant parents’ beliefs about the U.S. child welfare system may shape whether families seek support, disclose family needs, or avoid formal systems. Yet limited research has examined how these beliefs are organized or how they are associated with information sources and perceived familiarity with the system. Guided by cognitive schema and institutional trust frameworks, this study examined beliefs about the U.S. child welfare system among 295 foreign-born parents whose immigration status could be classified as permanent or temporary/other documented. Exploratory factor analysis of 11 investigator-developed belief items suggested two related dimensions: Perceived Child Welfare System Reach and Activity and Mistrustful and Stigmatizing Beliefs. Hierarchical ordinary least squares regression models examined associations between these belief dimensions and sociodemographic characteristics, immigration-related factors, psychosocial covariates, information sources, and self-reported familiarity. Information-source indicators explained additional variance in both belief dimensions. Internet searches and television or radio were associated with higher Perceived Child Welfare System Reach and Activity. The most notable finding was that parents who reported being unfamiliar with the child welfare system expressed stronger agreement across both dimensions. This association became stronger when unfamiliarity was defined as selecting no other information source. Findings suggest that unfamiliarity should not be understood as the absence of beliefs. Instead, immigrant parents with limited direct knowledge may still hold strong views shaped by indirect information, community narratives, and broader experiences with public institutions. Child welfare agencies and immigrant-serving organizations should provide clear, culturally responsive, and multilingual information about mandated reporting, parental rights, poverty-related need, neglect, and the range of child welfare responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal on Child Maltreatment Research Policy and Practice
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-026-00273-3
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immigrant Parents’ Beliefs About the U.S. Child Welfare System: The Role of Information Sources and Familiarity

Blessing Ngowari Ramsey-Soroghaye, Chien-Jen Chiang, Yangjin Park, Maryam Rafieifar et al.
International Journal on Child Maltreatment Research Policy and Practice
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Immigrant Parents’ Beliefs About the U.S. Child Welfare System: The Role of Information Sources and Familiarity

Blessing Ngowari Ramsey-Soroghaye, Chien-Jen Chiang, Yangjin Park, Maryam Rafieifar, Yao Wang, Sajede Tavakoli
article en

Abstract

Immigrant parents’ beliefs about the U.S. child welfare system may shape whether families seek support, disclose family needs, or avoid formal systems. Yet limited research has examined how these beliefs are organized or how they are associated with information sources and perceived familiarity with the system. Guided by cognitive schema and institutional trust frameworks, this study examined beliefs about the U.S. child welfare system among 295 foreign-born parents whose immigration status could be classified as permanent or temporary/other documented. Exploratory factor analysis of 11 investigator-developed belief items suggested two related dimensions: Perceived Child Welfare System Reach and Activity and Mistrustful and Stigmatizing Beliefs. Hierarchical ordinary least squares regression models examined associations between these belief dimensions and sociodemographic characteristics, immigration-related factors, psychosocial covariates, information sources, and self-reported familiarity. Information-source indicators explained additional variance in both belief dimensions. Internet searches and television or radio were associated with higher Perceived Child Welfare System Reach and Activity. The most notable finding was that parents who reported being unfamiliar with the child welfare system expressed stronger agreement across both dimensions. This association became stronger when unfamiliarity was defined as selecting no other information source. Findings suggest that unfamiliarity should not be understood as the absence of beliefs. Instead, immigrant parents with limited direct knowledge may still hold strong views shaped by indirect information, community narratives, and broader experiences with public institutions. Child welfare agencies and immigrant-serving organizations should provide clear, culturally responsive, and multilingual information about mandated reporting, parental rights, poverty-related need, neglect, and the range of child welfare responses.

International Journal on Child Maltreatment Research Policy and Practice
University of Georgia (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Montclair State University
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.