Paths to nowhere: An interview with Raymond Geuss about <i>Tracks in Chaos</i>

This interview with the philosopher Raymond Geuss, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Cambridge, explores the questions animating his 2026 book Tracks in Chaos: Philosophical Orientation and Political Reflection (Polity). The book's title invokes Heidegger's image of the Holzweg – forest tracks cut through labour that often lead nowhere – which Geuss develops into a figure for philosophy as a historically situated, constrained, and dependent activity rather than an autonomous system. Drawing on his formation in Heidegger, Marx, and Adorno, he defends a suspicion of ordinary language and everyday concepts, proposing a ‘binary vision’ for operating within social practices while seeing through them. He distinguishes three senses of authority, none of which philosophy can claim, and separates ‘moralising’ from moral judgement proper. The interview closes with his diagnosis of a disintegrating West, marked by concentrated wealth and power, financialisation, technological deskilling, and a pervasive loss of orientation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thesis Eleven
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136261473942
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paths to nowhere: An interview with Raymond Geuss about Tracks in Chaos

Howard Prosser
Thesis Eleven
Digital Education and Society
article

Paths to nowhere: An interview with Raymond Geuss about Tracks in Chaos

Howard Prosser
article en

Abstract

This interview with the philosopher Raymond Geuss, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Cambridge, explores the questions animating his 2026 book Tracks in Chaos: Philosophical Orientation and Political Reflection (Polity). The book's title invokes Heidegger's image of the Holzweg – forest tracks cut through labour that often lead nowhere – which Geuss develops into a figure for philosophy as a historically situated, constrained, and dependent activity rather than an autonomous system. Drawing on his formation in Heidegger, Marx, and Adorno, he defends a suspicion of ordinary language and everyday concepts, proposing a ‘binary vision’ for operating within social practices while seeing through them. He distinguishes three senses of authority, none of which philosophy can claim, and separates ‘moralising’ from moral judgement proper. The interview closes with his diagnosis of a disintegrating West, marked by concentrated wealth and power, financialisation, technological deskilling, and a pervasive loss of orientation.

Thesis Eleven
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.