Prevalence and Predictors of Non‐Frailty Among Homebound Older Adults

BACKGROUND: Older adults who are homebound, defined as those who rarely or never leave home without assistance or difficulty, experience high levels of multimorbidity, functional impairment, and mortality. Yet their needs remain poorly served by current care delivery models. While research on homebound older adults implies that these individuals are universally frail, this assumption has never been tested empirically. We aimed to better characterize the non-frail homebound older adult population. METHODS: Using nationally representative data from the National Health and Aging Trends study (NHATS), years 2011-2019 and 2021-2023, we identified the persistently homebound population (n = 3851 unique older adults). Frailty status was determined using the Fried physical frailty phenotype. We identified socio-demographic, health-related, functional and environmental characteristics associated with the absence of frailty among the homebound using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the homebound, 8.1% were non-frail, 47.9% were pre-frail, and 44.0% were frail. Characteristics associated with not being frail included being female (70% non-frail), married (47%), and Hispanic (15%). Non-frail homebound older adults had fewer mental health symptoms (12.4% depression, 8.3% anxiety non-frail; vs. 40.2% and 33.0% frail), were less likely to be socially isolated (25.3% non-frail vs. 37.7% frail), and more likely to be functionally independent (72.1% non-frail vs. 36.7% frail). Robust homebound older adults self-reported better health (79.0% non-frail vs. 34.6% frail), fewer hospitalizations (22.0% non-frail vs. 51.4% frail), and had lower mortality rates (6.4% non-frail vs. 20.5% frail) compared to frail/pre-frail older adults. CONCLUSION: While the vast majority of the homebound population is frail or pre-frail, a considerable portion are not frail. Efforts to manage high-need, high-cost populations such as homebound older adults must account for the heterogeneity of the population with efforts to better understand the non-frail subpopulation and target interventions tailored to their needs with the goal of potentially reversing their homebound status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70667
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence and Predictors of Non‐Frailty Among Homebound Older Adults

Mary Louise Pomeroy, Hanna Charankevich, Orla C. Sheehan, Jennifer M. Reckrey et al.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Prevalence and Predictors of Non‐Frailty Among Homebound Older Adults

Mary Louise Pomeroy, Hanna Charankevich, Orla C. Sheehan, Jennifer M. Reckrey, Bruce Leff, Christine S. Ritchie, Katherine A. Ornstein
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older adults who are homebound, defined as those who rarely or never leave home without assistance or difficulty, experience high levels of multimorbidity, functional impairment, and mortality. Yet their needs remain poorly served by current care delivery models. While research on homebound older adults implies that these individuals are universally frail, this assumption has never been tested empirically. We aimed to better characterize the non-frail homebound older adult population. METHODS: Using nationally representative data from the National Health and Aging Trends study (NHATS), years 2011-2019 and 2021-2023, we identified the persistently homebound population (n = 3851 unique older adults). Frailty status was determined using the Fried physical frailty phenotype. We identified socio-demographic, health-related, functional and environmental characteristics associated with the absence of frailty among the homebound using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the homebound, 8.1% were non-frail, 47.9% were pre-frail, and 44.0% were frail. Characteristics associated with not being frail included being female (70% non-frail), married (47%), and Hispanic (15%). Non-frail homebound older adults had fewer mental health symptoms (12.4% depression, 8.3% anxiety non-frail; vs. 40.2% and 33.0% frail), were less likely to be socially isolated (25.3% non-frail vs. 37.7% frail), and more likely to be functionally independent (72.1% non-frail vs. 36.7% frail). Robust homebound older adults self-reported better health (79.0% non-frail vs. 34.6% frail), fewer hospitalizations (22.0% non-frail vs. 51.4% frail), and had lower mortality rates (6.4% non-frail vs. 20.5% frail) compared to frail/pre-frail older adults. CONCLUSION: While the vast majority of the homebound population is frail or pre-frail, a considerable portion are not frail. Efforts to manage high-need, high-cost populations such as homebound older adults must account for the heterogeneity of the population with efforts to better understand the non-frail subpopulation and target interventions tailored to their needs with the goal of potentially reversing their homebound status.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Harvard University (US), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown (IE), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Optimal Solutions (United States) (US), New York University (US)
National Institute on Aging
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.