Safety of Selective and Routine Femoral Access Angiography Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

BACKGROUND: Postprocedural iliofemoral angiography is commonly used to detect access-site complications after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI). However, the clinical value of routine angiographic surveillance remains uncertain. AIMS: To compare vascular and access-site-related complications according to Vascular Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria associated with routine and selective postprocedural iliofemoral angiography after TF-TAVI. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1,147 TF-TAVI procedures at 2 sites of a single center with different institutional strategies for postprocedural angiographic assessment. One site routinely performed iliofemoral angiography after TAVI (n = 674), whereas the other applied a selective strategy based on procedural suspicion (n = 473). RESULTS: Vascular and access-site complications (VARC-3) were similar between strategies (selective 6.6% vs routine 8.0%; OR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.48-1.19). Routine angiography detected more access-site bleedings (13.9% vs 5.2%; P < 0.001), without differences in hemoglobin drop, transfusion due to access-site bleeding, or bleeding-related death. Overall vascular reinterventions were comparable (4.2% vs 6.5%; P = 0.095), with more catheter-based interventions in the routine strategy and more surgical/thrombin-based interventions in the selective strategy. In adjusted and inverse probability of treatment weights-weighted analyses, bleeding complications remained lower with the selective strategy, whereas overall VARC-3 complications did not differ. After adjustment using the inverse probability of treatment weights model, the angiography strategy was not associated with acute kidney injury despite higher total contrast in the routine group. CONCLUSION: Routine angiography increases detection of minor vascular abnormalities, while selective angiography guided by clinical suspicion may provide comparable clinical outcomes. Routine postprocedural angiography may be unnecessary in many patients. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal surveillance strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACC Advances
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.103127
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety of Selective and Routine Femoral Access Angiography Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Bui Bao Khanh Dinh, Alicja Zientara, Martin Czerny, Vera Oettinger et al.
JACC Advances
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Safety of Selective and Routine Femoral Access Angiography Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Bui Bao Khanh Dinh, Alicja Zientara, Martin Czerny, Vera Oettinger, Dirk Westermann, Roman Gottardi, Christoph B. Olivier, Jonathan Rilinger, Alexander von Ehr, Alexander Maier, Derek Hazard, Uwe Zeymer, Tasnim Mafiz, Constantin von zur Mühlen, Lukas A. Heger, Ingo Hilgendorf, Thomas Mauhardt
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postprocedural iliofemoral angiography is commonly used to detect access-site complications after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI). However, the clinical value of routine angiographic surveillance remains uncertain. AIMS: To compare vascular and access-site-related complications according to Vascular Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria associated with routine and selective postprocedural iliofemoral angiography after TF-TAVI. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1,147 TF-TAVI procedures at 2 sites of a single center with different institutional strategies for postprocedural angiographic assessment. One site routinely performed iliofemoral angiography after TAVI (n = 674), whereas the other applied a selective strategy based on procedural suspicion (n = 473). RESULTS: Vascular and access-site complications (VARC-3) were similar between strategies (selective 6.6% vs routine 8.0%; OR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.48-1.19). Routine angiography detected more access-site bleedings (13.9% vs 5.2%; P < 0.001), without differences in hemoglobin drop, transfusion due to access-site bleeding, or bleeding-related death. Overall vascular reinterventions were comparable (4.2% vs 6.5%; P = 0.095), with more catheter-based interventions in the routine strategy and more surgical/thrombin-based interventions in the selective strategy. In adjusted and inverse probability of treatment weights-weighted analyses, bleeding complications remained lower with the selective strategy, whereas overall VARC-3 complications did not differ. After adjustment using the inverse probability of treatment weights model, the angiography strategy was not associated with acute kidney injury despite higher total contrast in the routine group. CONCLUSION: Routine angiography increases detection of minor vascular abnormalities, while selective angiography guided by clinical suspicion may provide comparable clinical outcomes. Routine postprocedural angiography may be unnecessary in many patients. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal surveillance strategy.

JACC AdvancesVol. 5(9)
University of Freiburg (DE), Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.