Legitimacy, Specialism, and Sexual Violence: Officers’ Narratives of Broken and Repaired Trust Towards Procedural Justice and Normative Alignment

Abstract Public and media scrutiny has raised concerns around police officers’ abilities to prevent and deter sex offending, eroding public trust and compromising legitimacy beyond repair. Despite this, the relationship between self-legitimacy and the specialism for sex offences is under-explored. The study addressed this gap by drawing on constructivist interviews with 26 police officers. Participants emphasised the importance of investing in nationally recognised specialist practices to restore public trust and procedural fairness. For sex offences, specialism promoted legitimacy: internally by reinforcing officers’ confidence and role clarity; externally by improving credibility and victim engagement. Misalignments between public expectations and officers’ capacity were highlighted. Prioritising effective specialism could help constabularies rebuild public confidence for the investigation of sex offences and crime more broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-026-09852-z
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legitimacy, Specialism, and Sexual Violence: Officers’ Narratives of Broken and Repaired Trust Towards Procedural Justice and Normative Alignment

Kari Davies, Arianna Barbin, Mark Manning, Miranda A.H. Horvath
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

Legitimacy, Specialism, and Sexual Violence: Officers’ Narratives of Broken and Repaired Trust Towards Procedural Justice and Normative Alignment

Kari Davies, Arianna Barbin, Mark Manning, Miranda A.H. Horvath
article en

Abstract

Abstract Public and media scrutiny has raised concerns around police officers’ abilities to prevent and deter sex offending, eroding public trust and compromising legitimacy beyond repair. Despite this, the relationship between self-legitimacy and the specialism for sex offences is under-explored. The study addressed this gap by drawing on constructivist interviews with 26 police officers. Participants emphasised the importance of investing in nationally recognised specialist practices to restore public trust and procedural fairness. For sex offences, specialism promoted legitimacy: internally by reinforcing officers’ confidence and role clarity; externally by improving credibility and victim engagement. Misalignments between public expectations and officers’ capacity were highlighted. Prioritising effective specialism could help constabularies rebuild public confidence for the investigation of sex offences and crime more broadly.

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
University of Suffolk (GB), Bournemouth University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legitimacy, Specialism, and Sexual Violence: Officers’ Narratives of Broken and Repaired Trust Towards Procedural Justice and Normative Alignment — Kari Davies, Arianna Barbin, et al. · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS