Evaluating a 6.0-mm candidate warning level for intraoperative L5 nerve root retraction distance during posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Postoperative radiculitis secondary to excessive L5 nerve root retraction is a debilitating complication of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Despite its clinical prevalence, surgeons lack a standardized, visual safety threshold, often relying on intraoperative experience and tactile feedback. This study utilized maximum physical retraction distance as a practical but incomplete proxy for mechanical nerve stress to explore a potential risk threshold and evaluate its mid-term clinical impact. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 80 patients who underwent PLIF. All procedures were performed using a standardized technique to ensure consistency. The maximum intraoperative transverse retraction distance of the L5 nerve root was recorded. The primary endpoint was the development of postoperative radiculitis. The optimal diagnostic cutoff was determined via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A Cochran-Armitage test assessed the dose-response relationship, and 6-month visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and reintervention rates were evaluated. Results Postoperative radiculitis developed in 18 of 80 patients (22.5%). Multivariable regression confirmed maximum retraction distance as a robust independent predictor. ROC analysis established a 6.0 mm diagnostic cutoff (AUC = 0.678, P = 0.010; Negative Predictive Value = 87.2%). Retraction > 6.0 mm almost tripled the radiculitis rate compared to ≤ 6.0 mm (36.4% vs. 12.8%; RR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.19–6.82, P = 0.013), yielding a massive population attributable risk (PAR) of 43.3%. Furthermore, the injury risk escalated linearly with wider displacement ( P = 0.011). By 6 months, affected patients exhibited significantly worse VAS and ODI scores ( P < 0.01, Cohen’s d > 0.8), necessitating substantially more additional interventions (RR = 2.76) and reoperations (RR = 3.44). Conclusions Transverse L5 nerve root retraction exceeding 6.0 mm is associated with an elevated risk of postoperative radiculitis, significantly impairing mid-term clinical outcomes. In standard surgical settings lacking real-time force-sensing equipment, restricting nerve displacement to ≤ 6.0 mm provides surgeons with a practical candidate warning level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-10356-4
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating a 6.0-mm candidate warning level for intraoperative L5 nerve root retraction distance during posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective cohort study

Bangquan Liao, Jun Miao, Jie Lan, Shanglong Ning et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Evaluating a 6.0-mm candidate warning level for intraoperative L5 nerve root retraction distance during posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective cohort study

Bangquan Liao, Jun Miao, Jie Lan, Shanglong Ning, Zhiqing Chen, Qiang Yang, Min Wang, Jixin Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Postoperative radiculitis secondary to excessive L5 nerve root retraction is a debilitating complication of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Despite its clinical prevalence, surgeons lack a standardized, visual safety threshold, often relying on intraoperative experience and tactile feedback. This study utilized maximum physical retraction distance as a practical but incomplete proxy for mechanical nerve stress to explore a potential risk threshold and evaluate its mid-term clinical impact. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 80 patients who underwent PLIF. All procedures were performed using a standardized technique to ensure consistency. The maximum intraoperative transverse retraction distance of the L5 nerve root was recorded. The primary endpoint was the development of postoperative radiculitis. The optimal diagnostic cutoff was determined via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A Cochran-Armitage test assessed the dose-response relationship, and 6-month visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and reintervention rates were evaluated. Results Postoperative radiculitis developed in 18 of 80 patients (22.5%). Multivariable regression confirmed maximum retraction distance as a robust independent predictor. ROC analysis established a 6.0 mm diagnostic cutoff (AUC = 0.678, P = 0.010; Negative Predictive Value = 87.2%). Retraction > 6.0 mm almost tripled the radiculitis rate compared to ≤ 6.0 mm (36.4% vs. 12.8%; RR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.19–6.82, P = 0.013), yielding a massive population attributable risk (PAR) of 43.3%. Furthermore, the injury risk escalated linearly with wider displacement ( P = 0.011). By 6 months, affected patients exhibited significantly worse VAS and ODI scores ( P < 0.01, Cohen’s d > 0.8), necessitating substantially more additional interventions (RR = 2.76) and reoperations (RR = 3.44). Conclusions Transverse L5 nerve root retraction exceeding 6.0 mm is associated with an elevated risk of postoperative radiculitis, significantly impairing mid-term clinical outcomes. In standard surgical settings lacking real-time force-sensing equipment, restricting nerve displacement to ≤ 6.0 mm provides surgeons with a practical candidate warning level.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Tiangong University (CN), Tianjin Hospital (CN), Tianjin Beichen Hospital (CN), Tianjin Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.