When Sex Shapes Diabetes Care: Evidence from the AMD Annals Registry

BACKGROUND: Sex and gender differences substantially influence the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Although guideline-recommended cardiometabolic therapies have expanded in recent years, evidence suggests that women with T2D continue to experience disparities in risk factor control, access to cardioprotective treatments, and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate sex-based differences in quality of care, treatment patterns, and clinical inertia using real-world data from the Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD) Annals Initiative. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 2023 data from 296 diabetes clinics participating in the AMD Annals registry. Adults with active T2D (≥1 antidiabetic prescription and ≥1 clinical assessment in 2023) were included. Process indicators, intermediate outcomes, pharmacologic treatments, and final outcomes were assessed according to AMD Indicators (Revision 9). All analyses were stratified by sex. RESULTS: The study included 571,962 individuals with T2D (41.5% women). Glycemic control and overall quality-of-care scores were similar between sexes. However, women exhibited higher BMI, greater prevalence of severe obesity, poorer lipid control, and higher rates of reduced eGFR. Despite comparable or higher cardiometabolic risk, women were less frequently monitored for albuminuria and retinopathy and were significantly less likely to receive SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists, particularly in the presence of chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, or heart failure. Indicators of clinical inertia consistently disadvantaged women, especially regarding cardioprotective therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite comparable overall quality-of-care scores, clinically meaningful sex disparities persist in T2D management in Italy. Women experience a higher burden of metabolic risk and reduced access to evidence-based cardioprotective treatments. These findings highlight the urgent need for gender-sensitive diabetes care strategies to reduce therapeutic inequities and improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes in women with T2D.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Women s Health
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15409996261479909
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Sex Shapes Diabetes Care: Evidence from the AMD Annals Registry

C Suraci, Alessandra Luberto, De Cosmo S, Sara Piccini et al.
Journal of Women s Health
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

When Sex Shapes Diabetes Care: Evidence from the AMD Annals Registry

C Suraci, Alessandra Luberto, De Cosmo S, Sara Piccini, Andrea Da Porto, Elisa Manicardi, Giuseppina Russo, Riccardo Candido, on behalf of AMD ANNALS Study Group, Valeria Manicardi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sex and gender differences substantially influence the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Although guideline-recommended cardiometabolic therapies have expanded in recent years, evidence suggests that women with T2D continue to experience disparities in risk factor control, access to cardioprotective treatments, and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate sex-based differences in quality of care, treatment patterns, and clinical inertia using real-world data from the Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD) Annals Initiative. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 2023 data from 296 diabetes clinics participating in the AMD Annals registry. Adults with active T2D (≥1 antidiabetic prescription and ≥1 clinical assessment in 2023) were included. Process indicators, intermediate outcomes, pharmacologic treatments, and final outcomes were assessed according to AMD Indicators (Revision 9). All analyses were stratified by sex. RESULTS: The study included 571,962 individuals with T2D (41.5% women). Glycemic control and overall quality-of-care scores were similar between sexes. However, women exhibited higher BMI, greater prevalence of severe obesity, poorer lipid control, and higher rates of reduced eGFR. Despite comparable or higher cardiometabolic risk, women were less frequently monitored for albuminuria and retinopathy and were significantly less likely to receive SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists, particularly in the presence of chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, or heart failure. Indicators of clinical inertia consistently disadvantaged women, especially regarding cardioprotective therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite comparable overall quality-of-care scores, clinically meaningful sex disparities persist in T2D management in Italy. Women experience a higher burden of metabolic risk and reduced access to evidence-based cardioprotective treatments. These findings highlight the urgent need for gender-sensitive diabetes care strategies to reduce therapeutic inequities and improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes in women with T2D.

Journal of Women s Health
University of Messina (IT), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IT), University of Trieste (IT), Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia (IT), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna (IT), Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.