Research ethics and publication policies in journals using the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) academic publishing platform: a content analysis of 181 journals

Purpose: This study aimed to define key research ethics and publication policy areas and assess policy disclosure among journals hosted on the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) academic publishing platform.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional content analysis of journal policy documents. Fifteen policy areas were identified based on international guidelines, domestic reports, prior studies, and publisher policies related to artificial intelligence (AI) and data sharing. Policies from 181 journals were collected on July 10, 2025, and each journal was coded according to whether each policy area was disclosed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize disclosure overall and according to subject field, access model, and indexing status.Results: Journals disclosed a mean of 8.29 policy areas out of 15. Five journals disclosed none of the areas, whereas three disclosed all 15. The most frequently disclosed areas were copyright (158 of 181, 87.3%) and duplicate publication (157 of 181, 86.7%), followed by plagiarism, authorship, and sanctions for misconduct. Emerging governance policies were uncommon: only 5 journals disclosed an AI policy, and 29 disclosed a data sharing policy. When present, AI policies addressed non-authorship, disclosure requirements, scope limitations, accountability, and restrictions on reviewer use. Disclosure rates varied across disciplines, with medicine and pharmacy journals showing the highest rates overall. Open access journals generally disclosed more policy areas than subscription journals, whereas indexing status showed no consistent pattern.Conclusion: Policy disclosure among journals hosted on the KISTI academic publishing platform remains incomplete and uneven, particularly with respect to AI and data sharing. To address these gaps, journals should adopt standardized policy templates and receive targeted platform-supported guidance to strengthen research ethics and publication governance in Korea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Editing
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.403
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research ethics and publication policies in journals using the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) academic publishing platform: a content analysis of 181 journals

Jaemin Chung, Hyejin Lee, Eun Jee Lee
Science Editing
Academic Publishing and Open Access
article

Research ethics and publication policies in journals using the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) academic publishing platform: a content analysis of 181 journals

Jaemin Chung, Hyejin Lee, Eun Jee Lee
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to define key research ethics and publication policy areas and assess policy disclosure among journals hosted on the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) academic publishing platform.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional content analysis of journal policy documents. Fifteen policy areas were identified based on international guidelines, domestic reports, prior studies, and publisher policies related to artificial intelligence (AI) and data sharing. Policies from 181 journals were collected on July 10, 2025, and each journal was coded according to whether each policy area was disclosed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize disclosure overall and according to subject field, access model, and indexing status.Results: Journals disclosed a mean of 8.29 policy areas out of 15. Five journals disclosed none of the areas, whereas three disclosed all 15. The most frequently disclosed areas were copyright (158 of 181, 87.3%) and duplicate publication (157 of 181, 86.7%), followed by plagiarism, authorship, and sanctions for misconduct. Emerging governance policies were uncommon: only 5 journals disclosed an AI policy, and 29 disclosed a data sharing policy. When present, AI policies addressed non-authorship, disclosure requirements, scope limitations, accountability, and restrictions on reviewer use. Disclosure rates varied across disciplines, with medicine and pharmacy journals showing the highest rates overall. Open access journals generally disclosed more policy areas than subscription journals, whereas indexing status showed no consistent pattern.Conclusion: Policy disclosure among journals hosted on the KISTI academic publishing platform remains incomplete and uneven, particularly with respect to AI and data sharing. To address these gaps, journals should adopt standardized policy templates and receive targeted platform-supported guidance to strengthen research ethics and publication governance in Korea.

Science EditingVol. 13(2)
Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Academic Publishing and Open Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.