Food is Medicine Interventions to Improve Health

Barriers to healthy eating lead to substantial health harms, but clinicians have historically had few tools to help patients address them. To fill this gap, food is medicine (FIM) interventions seek to improve the prevention or management of specific clinical conditions through the provision of healthy food resources and other strategies to address barriers to healthy eating. This article describes the rationale for and major types of FIM and reviews key studies and developments in the field. We note that the evidence to date shows promising benefits for FIM, including for both clinical outcomes and health care utilization, but it also has meaningful limitations and unexpected findings. We discuss results from evaluations of large-scale FIM implementation, particularly in Medicaid, and why FIM studies may have been more or less effective in different contexts. We conclude with several implementation learnings that can guide researchers going forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Medicine
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-042325-042333
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Food is Medicine Interventions to Improve Health

Kevin G. Volpp, Hilary K. Seligman, Seth A. Berkowitz
Annual Review of Medicine
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Food is Medicine Interventions to Improve Health

Kevin G. Volpp, Hilary K. Seligman, Seth A. Berkowitz
article en

Abstract

Barriers to healthy eating lead to substantial health harms, but clinicians have historically had few tools to help patients address them. To fill this gap, food is medicine (FIM) interventions seek to improve the prevention or management of specific clinical conditions through the provision of healthy food resources and other strategies to address barriers to healthy eating. This article describes the rationale for and major types of FIM and reviews key studies and developments in the field. We note that the evidence to date shows promising benefits for FIM, including for both clinical outcomes and health care utilization, but it also has meaningful limitations and unexpected findings. We discuss results from evaluations of large-scale FIM implementation, particularly in Medicaid, and why FIM studies may have been more or less effective in different contexts. We conclude with several implementation learnings that can guide researchers going forward.

Annual Review of Medicine
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), American Heart Association (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of California System (US), Community Initiatives (US), William P. Wharton Trust (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Food is Medicine Interventions to Improve Health — Kevin G. Volpp, Hilary K. Seligman, et al. · Annual Review of Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS