Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure for varicose veins: An Indian expert consensus using a modified Delphi method

Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure (CAC) is a non-thermal, nontumescent option for treating saphenous reflux. This study aimed to develop a formal, evidence-based expert consensus on the use of CAC for the management of varicose veins in India. A modified Delphi consensus process was conducted. A panel of 12 experienced Indian interventional radiologists was convened. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement, achieved through anonymized voting and iterative discussions. All 12 panelists (100% participation) achieved a unanimous consensus (100% agreement) with the finalization of 29 consensus statements across eight domains. The consensus delineated the role of CAC across the clinical-etiological-anatomical-pathophysiological classes C2-C6 and in saphenous veins with diameters of 4-20 mm. The consensus provides a standardized procedural algorithm detailing specific steps for adhesive delivery, catheter recapture (recapturing the delivery catheter into the blue introducer sheath while intravascular before removal), and compression. CAC is recommended as an outpatient, non-tumescent day procedure using a 7F short introducer sheath; consequently, it is associated with reduced intra-procedural discomfort and reduced post-treatment bruising compared with thermal ablation. Key recommendations include: postprocedural compression stockings are not mandatory, early ambulation is encouraged, and structured follow-up is advised. The consensus also differentiates phlebitis (pain/erythema, absence of itching) from hypersensitivity (itching) to guide management, advises careful patient selection for shallow veins and operator judgment for large-diameter vessels, suggests considering prophylactic NSAID or antihistamine on a case-by-case basis, and recommends avoiding CAC in patients at high risk for immune-mediated reactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555261477131
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure for varicose veins: An Indian expert consensus using a modified Delphi method

Lenon Jason Dsouza, Brijesh Ray, Rochan Pant, Sridhar Devu et al.
Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
article

Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure for varicose veins: An Indian expert consensus using a modified Delphi method

Lenon Jason Dsouza, Brijesh Ray, Rochan Pant, Sridhar Devu, Lijesh Kumar, Bhavesh Arun Popat, P Sardà, Balaji Patel Kola, Navin Mulimani, Abhishek Bansal, Pankaj Banode, Saurabh Joshi
article en

Abstract

Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure (CAC) is a non-thermal, nontumescent option for treating saphenous reflux. This study aimed to develop a formal, evidence-based expert consensus on the use of CAC for the management of varicose veins in India. A modified Delphi consensus process was conducted. A panel of 12 experienced Indian interventional radiologists was convened. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement, achieved through anonymized voting and iterative discussions. All 12 panelists (100% participation) achieved a unanimous consensus (100% agreement) with the finalization of 29 consensus statements across eight domains. The consensus delineated the role of CAC across the clinical-etiological-anatomical-pathophysiological classes C2-C6 and in saphenous veins with diameters of 4-20 mm. The consensus provides a standardized procedural algorithm detailing specific steps for adhesive delivery, catheter recapture (recapturing the delivery catheter into the blue introducer sheath while intravascular before removal), and compression. CAC is recommended as an outpatient, non-tumescent day procedure using a 7F short introducer sheath; consequently, it is associated with reduced intra-procedural discomfort and reduced post-treatment bruising compared with thermal ablation. Key recommendations include: postprocedural compression stockings are not mandatory, early ambulation is encouraged, and structured follow-up is advised. The consensus also differentiates phlebitis (pain/erythema, absence of itching) from hypersensitivity (itching) to guide management, advises careful patient selection for shallow veins and operator judgment for large-diameter vessels, suggests considering prophylactic NSAID or antihistamine on a case-by-case basis, and recommends avoiding CAC in patients at high risk for immune-mediated reactions.

Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Father Muller Medical College Hospital (IN), Mahosot Hospital (LA), Medicare Rights Center (US), Orthopedic Specialty Hospital (US), Aster (IT), HealthCare Partners Medical Group (US), Global Hospitals (IN), Benvenue Medical (United States) (US), Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (IN), Diversified Maintenance Systems (United States) (US), Morrison Vein Institute (US), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.