A Comprehensive Review of Liquid Holdup Forecasting in Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Pipe Flows

Liquid holdup (HL) prediction in gas–liquid two-phase flows (TPF) has been studied extensively for decades. However, existing reviews and empirical correlations have largely treated key controlling parameters, particularly liquid viscosity and pipe inclination, as independent or secondary factors. This review is based on prior studies by providing a systematic synthesis of the coupled effect of high viscosity (200–800 mPa·s) and pipe inclination (0° to 90°) on both general liquid holdup (HL) and slug liquid holdup (HLs). These effects are regime-dependent: negligible in low-viscosity flows but dominant in high-viscosity, large-diameter, and undulating pipelines. The review identifies two critical limitations of current models: their systematic underprediction for high-viscosity fluids and their failure to account for inclination-driven HL variations, which can be as high as 10–30%. Consequently, this review advocates a paradigm shift toward data-driven intelligent models (e.g., Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs)) trained on comprehensive, well-curated datasets that explicitly capture the viscosity–inclination coupling. These hybrid models, which combine data-driven learning with physical constraints, provide the most viable path to overcome the fundamental limitations of current correlations and achieve accurate HL and HLs prediction for the design and operation of real-world, undulating pipeline systems handling viscous fluids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemEngineering
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering10080102
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Review of Liquid Holdup Forecasting in Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Pipe Flows

Seyyed Hossein Hosseini, Goodarz Ahmadi, Hajir Karimi, Martı́n Olazar et al.
ChemEngineering
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
article

A Comprehensive Review of Liquid Holdup Forecasting in Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Pipe Flows

Seyyed Hossein Hosseini, Goodarz Ahmadi, Hajir Karimi, Martı́n Olazar, Hamida Mobasheri, Ehsan Jafarbeigi
article en

Abstract

Liquid holdup (HL) prediction in gas–liquid two-phase flows (TPF) has been studied extensively for decades. However, existing reviews and empirical correlations have largely treated key controlling parameters, particularly liquid viscosity and pipe inclination, as independent or secondary factors. This review is based on prior studies by providing a systematic synthesis of the coupled effect of high viscosity (200–800 mPa·s) and pipe inclination (0° to 90°) on both general liquid holdup (HL) and slug liquid holdup (HLs). These effects are regime-dependent: negligible in low-viscosity flows but dominant in high-viscosity, large-diameter, and undulating pipelines. The review identifies two critical limitations of current models: their systematic underprediction for high-viscosity fluids and their failure to account for inclination-driven HL variations, which can be as high as 10–30%. Consequently, this review advocates a paradigm shift toward data-driven intelligent models (e.g., Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs)) trained on comprehensive, well-curated datasets that explicitly capture the viscosity–inclination coupling. These hybrid models, which combine data-driven learning with physical constraints, provide the most viable path to overcome the fundamental limitations of current correlations and achieve accurate HL and HLs prediction for the design and operation of real-world, undulating pipeline systems handling viscous fluids.

ChemEngineeringVol. 10(8)
University of the Basque Country (ES), Clarkson University (US), Yasouj University (IR), Ilam University (IR)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.