Bayesian variable selection for joint models of heterogeneous longitudinal variables and a binary outcome

Biomedical studies often collect mixed-type longitudinal data (e.g., clinical, lifestyle) to identify predictors of a binary health outcome. A common analytical challenge is to link these irregularly collected variables to the outcome, particularly when the number of potential predictors is large. While joint models (JM) can handle this complex data structure, a critical gap exists, as they lack a formal framework for variable selection, limiting their utility for identifying relevant predictors. This article fills that methodological gap by introducing two novel, structured Bayesian variable selection strategies. Our first approach (JM1) selects predictors for the binary outcome, while our more advanced approach (JM2) performs simultaneous two-level selection for both the outcome and the longitudinal trajectories. Our framework leverages shrinkage priors to handle high-dimensional predictors and interactions, preventing overfitting. To guide final variable selection, we extend false discovery rate-based rules to our complex, multi-part joint model, which also accommodates grouped categorical predictors. We apply our method to Women's Health Initiative and Life and Longevity After Cancer study data, identifying factors for post-treatment insomnia in breast cancer survivors. Our model identified a key predictor missed by conventional methods. This integrated approach provides a robust, interpretable, and computationally efficient framework, offering substantial gains in statistical power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802261478572
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian variable selection for joint models of heterogeneous longitudinal variables and a binary outcome

Lingpeng Shan, Electra D. Paskett, Michael L. Pennell, Michelle J. Naughton
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Bayesian variable selection for joint models of heterogeneous longitudinal variables and a binary outcome

Lingpeng Shan, Electra D. Paskett, Michael L. Pennell, Michelle J. Naughton
article en

Abstract

Biomedical studies often collect mixed-type longitudinal data (e.g., clinical, lifestyle) to identify predictors of a binary health outcome. A common analytical challenge is to link these irregularly collected variables to the outcome, particularly when the number of potential predictors is large. While joint models (JM) can handle this complex data structure, a critical gap exists, as they lack a formal framework for variable selection, limiting their utility for identifying relevant predictors. This article fills that methodological gap by introducing two novel, structured Bayesian variable selection strategies. Our first approach (JM1) selects predictors for the binary outcome, while our more advanced approach (JM2) performs simultaneous two-level selection for both the outcome and the longitudinal trajectories. Our framework leverages shrinkage priors to handle high-dimensional predictors and interactions, preventing overfitting. To guide final variable selection, we extend false discovery rate-based rules to our complex, multi-part joint model, which also accommodates grouped categorical predictors. We apply our method to Women's Health Initiative and Life and Longevity After Cancer study data, identifying factors for post-treatment insomnia in breast cancer survivors. Our model identified a key predictor missed by conventional methods. This integrated approach provides a robust, interpretable, and computationally efficient framework, offering substantial gains in statistical power.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
The Ohio State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.