Reliability-Aware Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis Under Missing and Corrupted Modalities

Multi-modal sentiment analysis integrates linguistic, acoustic, and visual evidence, yet the reliability of these streams varies across samples because of missing observations, masking, measurement noise, and feature corruption. This paper presents a trainable reliability-aware evidential fusion framework that estimates not only sentiment predictions but also modality-specific evidence, predictive uncertainty, observable input quality, cross-modal disagreement, and normalized sample-dependent fusion weights. Each available modality is independently encoded and processed by an evidential classification head and a quality estimation head. Availability masks enforce exact exclusion of missing streams, while estimated quality, Dirichlet uncertainty, and Jensen–Shannon disagreement jointly regulate the contribution of each observed stream. The model is optimized end-to-end using fused classification, evidential regularization, clean–corrupted consistency, reliability-calibrated cross-modal alignment, and quality regression objectives. Experiments are conducted on both CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI using their official speaker-independent splits. Binary classification follows the standard non-zero protocol, in which samples with sentiment score zero are excluded from Acc-2 and binary F1 evaluation; all labeled samples are retained for seven-class accuracy, mean absolute error, and correlation. The evaluation covers complete-input, every single- and double-modality missing pattern, graded and unseen corruption, combined missing-plus-corrupted conditions, calibration, selective prediction, statistical testing, and computational efficiency. All comparative values in the main tables are identified as local controlled adaptations under the common pipeline, while selected published reference values are reported separately to prevent provenance mixing. Across both datasets, the empirical results show that the proposed method preserves competitive complete-input performance while providing larger and more consistent gains as modality availability or integrity deteriorates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15163624
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability-Aware Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis Under Missing and Corrupted Modalities

Xianxun Zhu, Huilin Liu, Yubin Wu
Electronics
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Reliability-Aware Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis Under Missing and Corrupted Modalities

Xianxun Zhu, Huilin Liu, Yubin Wu
article en

Abstract

Multi-modal sentiment analysis integrates linguistic, acoustic, and visual evidence, yet the reliability of these streams varies across samples because of missing observations, masking, measurement noise, and feature corruption. This paper presents a trainable reliability-aware evidential fusion framework that estimates not only sentiment predictions but also modality-specific evidence, predictive uncertainty, observable input quality, cross-modal disagreement, and normalized sample-dependent fusion weights. Each available modality is independently encoded and processed by an evidential classification head and a quality estimation head. Availability masks enforce exact exclusion of missing streams, while estimated quality, Dirichlet uncertainty, and Jensen–Shannon disagreement jointly regulate the contribution of each observed stream. The model is optimized end-to-end using fused classification, evidential regularization, clean–corrupted consistency, reliability-calibrated cross-modal alignment, and quality regression objectives. Experiments are conducted on both CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI using their official speaker-independent splits. Binary classification follows the standard non-zero protocol, in which samples with sentiment score zero are excluded from Acc-2 and binary F1 evaluation; all labeled samples are retained for seven-class accuracy, mean absolute error, and correlation. The evaluation covers complete-input, every single- and double-modality missing pattern, graded and unseen corruption, combined missing-plus-corrupted conditions, calibration, selective prediction, statistical testing, and computational efficiency. All comparative values in the main tables are identified as local controlled adaptations under the common pipeline, while selected published reference values are reported separately to prevent provenance mixing. Across both datasets, the empirical results show that the proposed method preserves competitive complete-input performance while providing larger and more consistent gains as modality availability or integrity deteriorates.

ElectronicsVol. 15(16)
Shanghai University (CN), Northeastern University (CN), Macquarie University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.