The role of biomarkers across the care continuum in acute heart failure

Acute heart failure (AHF) remains a global health challenge, characterized by high morbidity, mortality, and frequent rehospitalizations. The heterogeneity of clinical presentations in AHF and its complex underlying pathophysiology complicates diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic decision-making. Biomarkers have reshaped the clinical landscape in AHF by providing objective, biologically-grounded insights that complement traditional clinical assessment. Natriuretic peptides are established as indispensable for diagnosis and prognosis, while troponins, soluble ST2, galectin-3, and even newer candidates such as adrenomedullin and CA-125 may capture complementary domains including myocardial injury, fibrosis, congestion, and systemic stress. Applied dynamically across the care continuum—from the emergency department to hospitalization, discharge, and follow-up—biomarkers may support earlier diagnosis, more refined risk assessment, monitoring of therapeutic response, and post-discharge surveillance. Evidence increasingly favors multimarker strategies, integrating diverse biological signals; these consistently outperform single-marker approaches. Risk scores that incorporate biomarkers further strengthen clinical decision-making by providing structured risk estimates at critical time points. Future studies must explore best means of combining multiple markers into panels and whether multimarker-guided strategies have benefit in improving outcomes beyond the natriuretic peptides and troponin. Future advances will depend on embedding biomarkers within precision-medicine frameworks. Phenotype-specific algorithms, integration into electronic health records with automated decision support, and the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning offer clear potential. Equally, innovations in point-of-care testing and remote monitoring may extend biomarker utility beyond hospital walls. Collectively, these developments could shift AHF management from reactive stabilization toward proactive, biomarker-guided care aimed at improving outcomes in this high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomarker Research
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-026-00987-z
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of biomarkers across the care continuum in acute heart failure

Arzu Kalaycı, James L. Januzzi, C. Michael Gibson
Biomarker Research
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

The role of biomarkers across the care continuum in acute heart failure

Arzu Kalaycı, James L. Januzzi, C. Michael Gibson
article en

Abstract

Acute heart failure (AHF) remains a global health challenge, characterized by high morbidity, mortality, and frequent rehospitalizations. The heterogeneity of clinical presentations in AHF and its complex underlying pathophysiology complicates diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic decision-making. Biomarkers have reshaped the clinical landscape in AHF by providing objective, biologically-grounded insights that complement traditional clinical assessment. Natriuretic peptides are established as indispensable for diagnosis and prognosis, while troponins, soluble ST2, galectin-3, and even newer candidates such as adrenomedullin and CA-125 may capture complementary domains including myocardial injury, fibrosis, congestion, and systemic stress. Applied dynamically across the care continuum—from the emergency department to hospitalization, discharge, and follow-up—biomarkers may support earlier diagnosis, more refined risk assessment, monitoring of therapeutic response, and post-discharge surveillance. Evidence increasingly favors multimarker strategies, integrating diverse biological signals; these consistently outperform single-marker approaches. Risk scores that incorporate biomarkers further strengthen clinical decision-making by providing structured risk estimates at critical time points. Future studies must explore best means of combining multiple markers into panels and whether multimarker-guided strategies have benefit in improving outcomes beyond the natriuretic peptides and troponin. Future advances will depend on embedding biomarkers within precision-medicine frameworks. Phenotype-specific algorithms, integration into electronic health records with automated decision support, and the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning offer clear potential. Equally, innovations in point-of-care testing and remote monitoring may extend biomarker utility beyond hospital walls. Collectively, these developments could shift AHF management from reactive stabilization toward proactive, biomarker-guided care aimed at improving outcomes in this high-risk population.

Biomarker Research
Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.