Fracture behavior in Charpy impact tests of wire arc additively manufactured (WAAM) carbon steel wall components

Abstract This study aims to clarify the challenges associated with applying conventional fracture evaluation methods to wire arc additive manufactured (WAAM) carbon steel components. Charpy impact tests were conducted on wall components fabricated using four types of carbon steel welding wires (SG2, SG3, ER110, and ELCOR M70) over a wide temperature range. The results revealed that significant scatter in absorbed energy and fracture morphology can occur even at identical test temperatures, particularly for SG2 and ELCOR M70. Fracture surface observations and quantitative analysis of cleavage facet size distributions demonstrated that this variability is significantly influenced by inherent microstructural heterogeneity in WAAM-fabricated materials. In addition, local microstructural variation at the notch root, which is intrinsically included in the Charpy testing method, is reflected in the results. In contrast, SG3 and ER110 exhibited relatively stable fracture behavior with smaller scatter, corresponding to their more homogeneous microstructures. These findings indicate that the scatter observed in Charpy impact test results reflects underlying microstructural heterogeneity, suggesting that careful interpretation of test results is required. Furthermore, detailed fractographic analysis enables the detection of toughness heterogeneity in these materials. This provides a practical basis for interpreting fracture test results in heterogeneous additively manufactured materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Welding in the World
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-026-02546-4
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fracture behavior in Charpy impact tests of wire arc additively manufactured (WAAM) carbon steel wall components

Hiroto Shoji, Uğur Gürol, M. Koçak, Ryo KINUGAWA et al.
Welding in the World
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Fracture behavior in Charpy impact tests of wire arc additively manufactured (WAAM) carbon steel wall components

Hiroto Shoji, Uğur Gürol, M. Koçak, Ryo KINUGAWA, Kazuma SHIMIZU, Fikri Bashar Yalciner, Mitsuru Ohata
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to clarify the challenges associated with applying conventional fracture evaluation methods to wire arc additive manufactured (WAAM) carbon steel components. Charpy impact tests were conducted on wall components fabricated using four types of carbon steel welding wires (SG2, SG3, ER110, and ELCOR M70) over a wide temperature range. The results revealed that significant scatter in absorbed energy and fracture morphology can occur even at identical test temperatures, particularly for SG2 and ELCOR M70. Fracture surface observations and quantitative analysis of cleavage facet size distributions demonstrated that this variability is significantly influenced by inherent microstructural heterogeneity in WAAM-fabricated materials. In addition, local microstructural variation at the notch root, which is intrinsically included in the Charpy testing method, is reflected in the results. In contrast, SG3 and ER110 exhibited relatively stable fracture behavior with smaller scatter, corresponding to their more homogeneous microstructures. These findings indicate that the scatter observed in Charpy impact test results reflects underlying microstructural heterogeneity, suggesting that careful interpretation of test results is required. Furthermore, detailed fractographic analysis enables the detection of toughness heterogeneity in these materials. This provides a practical basis for interpreting fracture test results in heterogeneous additively manufactured materials.

Welding in the World
Osaka Gakuin University (JP), Abu Dhabi Health Services (AE), Gedik University (TR), The University of Osaka (JP)
Osaka University
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.