Into the Bermuda Triangle: How Prime Ministers Fall

ABSTRACT Eleven years after David Cameron promised ‘stability and strong government’; nine years after Theresa May pledged ‘strong and stable leadership’; and two years after Keir Starmer vowed to ‘stop the chaos’, the UK has its seventh prime minister in a decade. Most analyses emphasise either the failings of individual leaders, the challenges confronting modern governments or the erosion of state‐capacity and party loyalties. Yet such accounts are quite present‐centred: they rarely ask whether the challenges facing government today are worse than in previous eras, nor do they pay much attention to earlier periods of churn. This article explores periods of volatility across two centuries, identifying a series of common pressures: the detonation of an explosive political question; periods of financial strain and public debt; disruptive forms of media; and party succession‐crises. It notes that such periods can also be creative, and warns against attempts to rebuild an old political settlement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IPPR Progressive Review
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.70021
Primary Topic
Political and Economic history of UK and US
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Into the Bermuda Triangle: How Prime Ministers Fall

Robert Saunders
IPPR Progressive Review
Political and Economic history of UK and US
article

Into the Bermuda Triangle: How Prime Ministers Fall

Robert Saunders
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Eleven years after David Cameron promised ‘stability and strong government’; nine years after Theresa May pledged ‘strong and stable leadership’; and two years after Keir Starmer vowed to ‘stop the chaos’, the UK has its seventh prime minister in a decade. Most analyses emphasise either the failings of individual leaders, the challenges confronting modern governments or the erosion of state‐capacity and party loyalties. Yet such accounts are quite present‐centred: they rarely ask whether the challenges facing government today are worse than in previous eras, nor do they pay much attention to earlier periods of churn. This article explores periods of volatility across two centuries, identifying a series of common pressures: the detonation of an explosive political question; periods of financial strain and public debt; disruptive forms of media; and party succession‐crises. It notes that such periods can also be creative, and warns against attempts to rebuild an old political settlement.

IPPR Progressive Review
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political and Economic history of UK and US
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.