Sacralizing, Materializing, Normalizing China: Monarchy, Merchants, and Media in Contemporary Thailand

Thailand’s relations with China have expanded in recent decades through diplomacy, cultural exchange, and economic integration. Scholars have explained such expansion through economic interdependence and geopolitical alignment. This article suggests that the durability of Thailand-China relations also depends on mechanisms of social legitimation operating in Thai society; we conceptualize these mechanisms as a monarchy-merchant-media (3M) nexus. Royal diplomacy sacralizes bilateral ties through symbolic authority, corporate networks materialize them through investment and commercial integration, and popular media normalizes them through cultural representation and everyday consumption. Rather than operating sequentially, these forces interact to embed China’s presence in Thailand’s cultural landscape and political economy. While tensions surrounding Chinese influence periodically emerge in Thailand, the configuration of symbolic authority, capital networks, and cultural narratives helps stabilize bilateral relations. By highlighting these processes, the article contributes to debates on how asymmetrical regional power can be reproduced not only through state coercion but also through socially embedded forms of legitimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific Affairs
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0030851x.2026.2712229
Primary Topic
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sacralizing, Materializing, Normalizing China: Monarchy, Merchants, and Media in Contemporary Thailand

Ying‐kit Chan, Chaiyaporn Phayakhrut
Pacific Affairs
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
article

Sacralizing, Materializing, Normalizing China: Monarchy, Merchants, and Media in Contemporary Thailand

Ying‐kit Chan, Chaiyaporn Phayakhrut
article en

Abstract

Thailand’s relations with China have expanded in recent decades through diplomacy, cultural exchange, and economic integration. Scholars have explained such expansion through economic interdependence and geopolitical alignment. This article suggests that the durability of Thailand-China relations also depends on mechanisms of social legitimation operating in Thai society; we conceptualize these mechanisms as a monarchy-merchant-media (3M) nexus. Royal diplomacy sacralizes bilateral ties through symbolic authority, corporate networks materialize them through investment and commercial integration, and popular media normalizes them through cultural representation and everyday consumption. Rather than operating sequentially, these forces interact to embed China’s presence in Thailand’s cultural landscape and political economy. While tensions surrounding Chinese influence periodically emerge in Thailand, the configuration of symbolic authority, capital networks, and cultural narratives helps stabilize bilateral relations. By highlighting these processes, the article contributes to debates on how asymmetrical regional power can be reproduced not only through state coercion but also through socially embedded forms of legitimacy.

Pacific Affairs
Thammasat University (TH), National University of Singapore (SG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sacralizing, Materializing, Normalizing China: Monarchy, Merchants, and Media in Contemporary Thailand — Ying‐kit Chan, Chaiyaporn Phayakhrut · Pacific Affairs (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS