Discrepancies with Final Diagnosis in Head and Neck Intraoperative Frozen Section

PURPOSE: Creating a frozen section slide and crafting an interpretation is a multistep process with multiple possible points of failure. Head and neck frozen section pathology presents particular technical and diagnostic challenges. The aim of our study was to identify discrepancies between head/neck intraoperative and final diagnoses, determine the site of process failure, and assess the potential causes. METHODS: Concordance data from head and neck intraoperative and final diagnoses (2020-2023) were queried from our LIS-embedded quality assurance system. Discrepancies were categorized as major and minor, with major defined as those that would have altered the surgical procedure. RESULTS: We found 71 total discrepancies out of 1844 head and neck cases (3.9%). Major discrepancies accounted for 48/1844 (2.7%). Only major errors were considered for further study and were classified primarily into three categories: (1) inadequate gross sampling by the prosector, usually involving mucosal tissues of excised large specimens for evaluation of margins for dysplasia/carcinoma (14/48 cases; 29%), (2) insufficient sectioning into the block leaving undetected tissue unexamined (9/48 cases; 19%), and (3) interpretative errors (23/48 cases; 48%). The most common major interpretative errors involved the diagnosis of squamous dysplasia (9 cases), failure to identify minimally invasive squamous carcinoma (4 cases), failure to identify parathyroid and thyroid tissues (5 cases), and incorrect diagnoses of non-squamous neoplasms (5 cases). Two errors (4%) were ascribed to processing artifact issues in the frozen section. CONCLUSION: Half of diagnostic discrepancies occurred at steps prior to microscopic interpretation. Management of specimen grossing and tissue selection in large specimens, adequate block sectioning, and adherence to diagnostic criteria for difficult but common issues such as squamous dysplasia, minimally invasive carcinoma and thyroid/parathyroid morphology may help reduce intraoperative/final diagnosis discrepancies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Head and Neck Pathology
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-026-01959-3
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrepancies with Final Diagnosis in Head and Neck Intraoperative Frozen Section

S.J. Albright, Alexandra Isaacson, Robert Robinson
Head and Neck Pathology
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Discrepancies with Final Diagnosis in Head and Neck Intraoperative Frozen Section

S.J. Albright, Alexandra Isaacson, Robert Robinson
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Creating a frozen section slide and crafting an interpretation is a multistep process with multiple possible points of failure. Head and neck frozen section pathology presents particular technical and diagnostic challenges. The aim of our study was to identify discrepancies between head/neck intraoperative and final diagnoses, determine the site of process failure, and assess the potential causes. METHODS: Concordance data from head and neck intraoperative and final diagnoses (2020-2023) were queried from our LIS-embedded quality assurance system. Discrepancies were categorized as major and minor, with major defined as those that would have altered the surgical procedure. RESULTS: We found 71 total discrepancies out of 1844 head and neck cases (3.9%). Major discrepancies accounted for 48/1844 (2.7%). Only major errors were considered for further study and were classified primarily into three categories: (1) inadequate gross sampling by the prosector, usually involving mucosal tissues of excised large specimens for evaluation of margins for dysplasia/carcinoma (14/48 cases; 29%), (2) insufficient sectioning into the block leaving undetected tissue unexamined (9/48 cases; 19%), and (3) interpretative errors (23/48 cases; 48%). The most common major interpretative errors involved the diagnosis of squamous dysplasia (9 cases), failure to identify minimally invasive squamous carcinoma (4 cases), failure to identify parathyroid and thyroid tissues (5 cases), and incorrect diagnoses of non-squamous neoplasms (5 cases). Two errors (4%) were ascribed to processing artifact issues in the frozen section. CONCLUSION: Half of diagnostic discrepancies occurred at steps prior to microscopic interpretation. Management of specimen grossing and tissue selection in large specimens, adequate block sectioning, and adherence to diagnostic criteria for difficult but common issues such as squamous dysplasia, minimally invasive carcinoma and thyroid/parathyroid morphology may help reduce intraoperative/final diagnosis discrepancies.

Head and Neck PathologyVol. 20(1)
University of Iowa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discrepancies with Final Diagnosis in Head and Neck Intraoperative Frozen Section — S.J. Albright, Alexandra Isaacson, et al. · Head and Neck Pathology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS