Comparative Analysis of Multimodal AI Models for Automated Construction Safety Monitoring and Reporting

Abstract The construction industry accounts for a significant portion of workplace fatalities in the United States. Health and safety hazards frequently go unrecognized, potentially leading to injuries and death. However, traditional computer vision methods are often limited to specific object detection tasks [e.g., personal protective equipment (PPE) compliance] and their adoption introduces challenges in interpreting complex, contextual hazard scenarios. Furthermore, the scarcity of annotated accident data hinders the development of fully supervised models. Consequently, this manuscript formally characterizes the performance of pretrained multimodal Artificial Intelligence (AI) for automating hazard recognition. Furthermore, the performance of such models is also tested on game engine-based synthetic data, to investigate whether it can be leveraged for data augmentation in order to overcome the scarcity of real-world training examples. To address these questions, this study formally evaluates the effectiveness of AI models over multiple iterations of the models’ architecture for the domain-specific application of automated construction hazard assessment from multimodal inputs. The research presented herein leverages publicly available pretrained vision-language models and evaluates their performance across three core tasks: binary hazard alerts, detailed hazard understanding, and automated citation generation. A dataset of annotated real-world construction images is presented to benchmark the performance of models. The dataset is also made public to provide a standardized means for comparing performance across different models. Results reported herein indicate that leading AI models can achieve high, although not perfect, recognition accuracy without fine-tuning. However, model performance varies across hazard categories, and newer generations show diminishing returns. Consequently, the study introduces and validates high-fidelity, game engine-based synthetic images as a solution. By generating high-fidelity digital images of dangerous activities, synthetic data can help bridge the scarcity of real-world hazard examples. This approach increases opportunities to improve these models with task-specific data, supporting continued progress beyond current limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jccee5.cpeng-7383
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Multimodal AI Models for Automated Construction Safety Monitoring and Reporting

Alessandro Fascetti, Trevor Neece
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Comparative Analysis of Multimodal AI Models for Automated Construction Safety Monitoring and Reporting

Alessandro Fascetti, Trevor Neece
article en

Abstract

Abstract The construction industry accounts for a significant portion of workplace fatalities in the United States. Health and safety hazards frequently go unrecognized, potentially leading to injuries and death. However, traditional computer vision methods are often limited to specific object detection tasks [e.g., personal protective equipment (PPE) compliance] and their adoption introduces challenges in interpreting complex, contextual hazard scenarios. Furthermore, the scarcity of annotated accident data hinders the development of fully supervised models. Consequently, this manuscript formally characterizes the performance of pretrained multimodal Artificial Intelligence (AI) for automating hazard recognition. Furthermore, the performance of such models is also tested on game engine-based synthetic data, to investigate whether it can be leveraged for data augmentation in order to overcome the scarcity of real-world training examples. To address these questions, this study formally evaluates the effectiveness of AI models over multiple iterations of the models’ architecture for the domain-specific application of automated construction hazard assessment from multimodal inputs. The research presented herein leverages publicly available pretrained vision-language models and evaluates their performance across three core tasks: binary hazard alerts, detailed hazard understanding, and automated citation generation. A dataset of annotated real-world construction images is presented to benchmark the performance of models. The dataset is also made public to provide a standardized means for comparing performance across different models. Results reported herein indicate that leading AI models can achieve high, although not perfect, recognition accuracy without fine-tuning. However, model performance varies across hazard categories, and newer generations show diminishing returns. Consequently, the study introduces and validates high-fidelity, game engine-based synthetic images as a solution. By generating high-fidelity digital images of dangerous activities, synthetic data can help bridge the scarcity of real-world hazard examples. This approach increases opportunities to improve these models with task-specific data, supporting continued progress beyond current limitations.

Journal of Computing in Civil EngineeringVol. 40(6)
University of Central Florida (US), University of Pittsburgh (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.