The mechanics and kinematics of freehand and anvil-supported flake retouching: Unpacking the technology of stone tula adzes from the Scarsdale 1 cache, Queensland, Australia

The tula adze is one of the best-described artefact types of the Australian archaeological record. Historical records describe the production of these retouched flakes and their function as hafted woodworking tools. A thick, short flake with a prominent bulb of percussion was retouched into shape across the distal end using either a hard hammerstone or a wooden indentor, with further retouch occurring during the life of the tool as it was used and resharpened. Flake retouching in Australia was historically depicted to have been done freehand, by holding the flake in one hand and the indentor in the other. Using data from the Scarsdale 1 cache from Pitta Pitta Country, western Queensland—a group of 60 tulas buried together in the context of an extensive exchange system operating through this region—this paper presents archaeological evidence for a second retouch technique whereby the tula was braced on an anvil during retouch using a technical gesture comparable to backing. Here we explore the kinematics and fracture mechanics involved in the freehand and anvil retouching techniques and propose that the anvil technique in making the Scarsdale 1 cache tulas was accomplished by novice stoneworkers. This, in turn, suggests that production of tools for exchange was a group-based endeavour and an opportunity for inducting novices into the stoneworkers’ community of practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Archaeology
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2026.2704136
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The mechanics and kinematics of freehand and anvil-supported flake retouching: Unpacking the technology of stone tula adzes from the Scarsdale 1 cache, Queensland, Australia

Mark W. Moore, Yinika Perston, Lorna Bogdanek
Australian Archaeology
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

The mechanics and kinematics of freehand and anvil-supported flake retouching: Unpacking the technology of stone tula adzes from the Scarsdale 1 cache, Queensland, Australia

Mark W. Moore, Yinika Perston, Lorna Bogdanek
article en

Abstract

The tula adze is one of the best-described artefact types of the Australian archaeological record. Historical records describe the production of these retouched flakes and their function as hafted woodworking tools. A thick, short flake with a prominent bulb of percussion was retouched into shape across the distal end using either a hard hammerstone or a wooden indentor, with further retouch occurring during the life of the tool as it was used and resharpened. Flake retouching in Australia was historically depicted to have been done freehand, by holding the flake in one hand and the indentor in the other. Using data from the Scarsdale 1 cache from Pitta Pitta Country, western Queensland—a group of 60 tulas buried together in the context of an extensive exchange system operating through this region—this paper presents archaeological evidence for a second retouch technique whereby the tula was braced on an anvil during retouch using a technical gesture comparable to backing. Here we explore the kinematics and fracture mechanics involved in the freehand and anvil retouching techniques and propose that the anvil technique in making the Scarsdale 1 cache tulas was accomplished by novice stoneworkers. This, in turn, suggests that production of tools for exchange was a group-based endeavour and an opportunity for inducting novices into the stoneworkers’ community of practice.

Australian Archaeology
Griffith University (AU), University of New England (US), Tharawal Aboriginal (AU)
University of New England, Griffith University, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The mechanics and kinematics of freehand and anvil-supported flake retouching: Unpacking the technology of stone tula adzes from the Scarsdale 1 cache, Queensland, Australia — Mark W. Moore, Yinika Perston, et al. · Australian Archaeology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS