Comparison of Cup-to-disc Ratio Estimates Using Wide Field Fundus Photography and Optical Coherence Tomography

Purpose: We compared cup-to-disc ratio estimates obtained using wide-field fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT), both of which are widely used for fundus examination.Methods: In total, 130 eyes from 65 patients were included and categorized as 53 right eyes and 53 left eyes from patients with diabetes mellitus, and 12 right eyes and 12 left eyes from patients without diabetes mellitus. Vertical cup-to-disc ratios (VCDRs) were measured using wide-field fundus photography and OCT. Differences in VCDR measurements between the two modalities were analyzed using generalized estimating equations with an exchangeable working correlation structure to account for within-subject correlation between fellow eyes.Results: Mean VCDRs measured using wide-field fundus photography were 0.64 ± 0.17 and 0.61 ± 0.16 for diabetic right and left eyes, respectively, and 0.69 ± 0.14 and 0.64 ± 0.21 for non-diabetic right and left eyes, respectively. Corresponding VCDRs measured using OCT were 0.69 ± 0.12 and 0.67 ± 0.13 for diabetic right and left eyes, respectively, and 0.60 ± 0.24 and 0.68 ± 0.12 for non-diabetic right and left eyes, respectively. OCT significantly overestimated VCDRs in diabetic eyes compared to wide-field fundus photography. In contrast, OCT underestimated VCDRs in non-diabetic right eyes and overestimated VCDRs in non-diabetic left eyes; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Generalized estimating equation analysis demonstrated that diabetes mellitus was a significant factor associated with differences in VCDR measurements between wide-field fundus photography and OCT.Conclusions: VCDRs measured using OCT in patients with diabetes mellitus were greater than those estimated using wide-field fundus photography. These findings emphasize the importance of carefully selecting and interpreting diagnostic, screening, and follow-up modalities for VCDR assessment in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2026.67.8.280
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Cup-to-disc Ratio Estimates Using Wide Field Fundus Photography and Optical Coherence Tomography

Seong Joo Shin, Jae Yeun Lee, Dasom An
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Comparison of Cup-to-disc Ratio Estimates Using Wide Field Fundus Photography and Optical Coherence Tomography

Seong Joo Shin, Jae Yeun Lee, Dasom An
article en

Abstract

Purpose: We compared cup-to-disc ratio estimates obtained using wide-field fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT), both of which are widely used for fundus examination.Methods: In total, 130 eyes from 65 patients were included and categorized as 53 right eyes and 53 left eyes from patients with diabetes mellitus, and 12 right eyes and 12 left eyes from patients without diabetes mellitus. Vertical cup-to-disc ratios (VCDRs) were measured using wide-field fundus photography and OCT. Differences in VCDR measurements between the two modalities were analyzed using generalized estimating equations with an exchangeable working correlation structure to account for within-subject correlation between fellow eyes.Results: Mean VCDRs measured using wide-field fundus photography were 0.64 ± 0.17 and 0.61 ± 0.16 for diabetic right and left eyes, respectively, and 0.69 ± 0.14 and 0.64 ± 0.21 for non-diabetic right and left eyes, respectively. Corresponding VCDRs measured using OCT were 0.69 ± 0.12 and 0.67 ± 0.13 for diabetic right and left eyes, respectively, and 0.60 ± 0.24 and 0.68 ± 0.12 for non-diabetic right and left eyes, respectively. OCT significantly overestimated VCDRs in diabetic eyes compared to wide-field fundus photography. In contrast, OCT underestimated VCDRs in non-diabetic right eyes and overestimated VCDRs in non-diabetic left eyes; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Generalized estimating equation analysis demonstrated that diabetes mellitus was a significant factor associated with differences in VCDR measurements between wide-field fundus photography and OCT.Conclusions: VCDRs measured using OCT in patients with diabetes mellitus were greater than those estimated using wide-field fundus photography. These findings emphasize the importance of carefully selecting and interpreting diagnostic, screening, and follow-up modalities for VCDR assessment in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological SocietyVol. 67(8)
Sahmyook Medical Center (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Cup-to-disc Ratio Estimates Using Wide Field Fundus Photography and Optical Coherence Tomography — Seong Joo Shin, Jae Yeun Lee, et al. · Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS