The hematology workforce in the United States: past, present, and strategies for the future

From 2017-2021, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) completed the largest study ever conducted of the hematology workforce in the United States (US). The study highlighted a deficit in the classical hematology (CH) workforce: despite very high CH clinical volumes encountered by practicing hematologists and medical oncologists, less than 5% of all hematology and medical oncology fellows reported having a career focus in CH. Underlying this was a lack of mentorship in CH compared to malignant hematology and solid tumor oncology. In this Viewpoint article, we discuss factors shaping the US hematology workforce and how decades of inadequate investment in mentorship, research, and subspecialty training contributed to low interest in CH among trainees. We present an overview of ASH's many initiatives to grow the hematology clinical and research workforce in the US and globally, for the future of the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Advances
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025019451
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The hematology workforce in the United States: past, present, and strategies for the future

Ted Wun, Josel Fritz, Soo Jung Park, Leslie R. Ellis et al.
Blood Advances
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

The hematology workforce in the United States: past, present, and strategies for the future

Ted Wun, Josel Fritz, Soo Jung Park, Leslie R. Ellis, Hetty E. Carraway, Clese Erikson, Melody Smith, Donna DiMichele, Anita Rajasekhar, Andrés Gómez‐De León, Tiffany L Lucas, Laura DeCastro, Alfred Ian Lee, Georgette A. Dent, Leah E. Masselink, Lachelle D. Weeks, Nathalie van Havre, Deva Sharma, Nathan T. Connell, Marquita Nelson, Srikanth Nagalla, Martha Pritchett Mims, Casey L. O’Connell, Ariela L. Marshall, Rakhi P. Naik, Robby James Reynolds, Alison W. Loren
article en

Abstract

From 2017-2021, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) completed the largest study ever conducted of the hematology workforce in the United States (US). The study highlighted a deficit in the classical hematology (CH) workforce: despite very high CH clinical volumes encountered by practicing hematologists and medical oncologists, less than 5% of all hematology and medical oncology fellows reported having a career focus in CH. Underlying this was a lack of mentorship in CH compared to malignant hematology and solid tumor oncology. In this Viewpoint article, we discuss factors shaping the US hematology workforce and how decades of inadequate investment in mentorship, research, and subspecialty training contributed to low interest in CH among trainees. We present an overview of ASH's many initiatives to grow the hematology clinical and research workforce in the US and globally, for the future of the field.

Blood Advances
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Southern California (US), Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (MX), Baylor College of Medicine (US), George Washington University (US), American Society of Hematology (US), University of Minnesota System (US), UC San Diego Health System (US), Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center (US), Yale University (US), University of Florida (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Dr. Herbert & Nicole Wertheim Family Foundation (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Moores Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania (US), University of California, Davis (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), Stanford University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.