NMR metabolomics and glycomics for cancer detection in patients with non-specific symptoms: a prospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND: H NMR-based metabolomics can identify cancer with high accuracy. SCAN2 evaluated whether integrating metabolomics with glycomics provides complementary molecular information and improves discrimination in a clinically complex, real-world population. METHODS: Serum from 369 SCAN patients (59 cancers) was analysed using AXINON® System-derived NMR metabolomics and HPLC-MS glycomics. Machine-learning models were trained to predict cancer status, with performance assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of pooled cross-validated predictions. To place cancer risk in a broader clinical context, a second classifier modelling alternative non-cancer diagnosis was incorporated, and mean predicted probabilities from both models were jointly projected into a two-dimensional space, maintaining strict separation of training and test data. FINDINGS: In the full cohort, integration of glycomics with metabolomics achieved an AUC of 0.814 (95% CI 0.808-0.820). In a refined sub-cohort excluding major comorbidities and selected cancer types (32 cancers, 277 non-cancers), performance improved to an AUC of 0.884 (95% CI 0.879-0.890). Discriminatory features included cancer-associated biantennary fucosylated glycans alongside amino acid metabolites (glutamate, histidine) and lipoprotein-related measures. A classifier distinguishing metastatic from non-metastatic disease (n = 29 vs. 30) achieved an AUC of 0.80. Joint probability analysis in the full cohort preserved cancer-associated signatures across comorbidity burden, with projection-based classification achieving an accuracy of 89.2% (95% CI 85.7-92.6). INTERPRETATION: These findings validate the SCAN1 metabolomic signature in a more clinically complex cohort and indicate that integrating glycomics with metabolomics provides complementary biological information for cancer discrimination. Joint probability analysis provides an interpretable framework for cancer risk stratification within multimorbid diagnostic pathways, supporting the clinical potential of scalable multi-omics blood testing. FUNDING: EPSRC, EU Horizon 2020, Wellcome/MLSTF, Novo Nordisk Foundation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EBioMedicine
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106434
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NMR metabolomics and glycomics for cancer detection in patients with non-specific symptoms: a prospective observational cohort study

R Benamore, Laura Heath, Jack J. Miller, Abi G. Yates et al.
EBioMedicine
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
article

NMR metabolomics and glycomics for cancer detection in patients with non-specific symptoms: a prospective observational cohort study

R Benamore, Laura Heath, Jack J. Miller, Abi G. Yates, Zoe Kaveney, Nia Taylor, Jack Cheeseman, Tereza Kačerová, Sophie Roberts, James R. Larkin, Shyamal Saujani, Niamh Appleby, Shelley Hayles, Eric Schiffer, Guanke Bao, Kiana K Collins, Georgeta Ciuban, Gagandeep Batth, L. M. H. Wing, Andrew Blake, Suzie Anthony, Sebastian de Jel, Daniel Mitchener, Suzanne Waterfield, D. Anthony, Philippa L. Harris Gleave, Fergus Gleeson, Boris Shulgin, Isabella de Vere Hunt, Helene Dreau, Niall Moore, Andrew Slater, Brian Nicholson, Georgia Elgood-Hunt, Ashley Jackson, Catherine Johnson, Sarah Smith, Daniel I.R. Spencer, David Lewis, Anna Schuh, Alexandra Montagu, Rosie Lomas, Sharon Tonner, Julia-Ann Moreland, Neelaksh Sadhoo, Nick Gibb, Monica Evans, Hasan Al-Sattar
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: H NMR-based metabolomics can identify cancer with high accuracy. SCAN2 evaluated whether integrating metabolomics with glycomics provides complementary molecular information and improves discrimination in a clinically complex, real-world population. METHODS: Serum from 369 SCAN patients (59 cancers) was analysed using AXINON® System-derived NMR metabolomics and HPLC-MS glycomics. Machine-learning models were trained to predict cancer status, with performance assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of pooled cross-validated predictions. To place cancer risk in a broader clinical context, a second classifier modelling alternative non-cancer diagnosis was incorporated, and mean predicted probabilities from both models were jointly projected into a two-dimensional space, maintaining strict separation of training and test data. FINDINGS: In the full cohort, integration of glycomics with metabolomics achieved an AUC of 0.814 (95% CI 0.808-0.820). In a refined sub-cohort excluding major comorbidities and selected cancer types (32 cancers, 277 non-cancers), performance improved to an AUC of 0.884 (95% CI 0.879-0.890). Discriminatory features included cancer-associated biantennary fucosylated glycans alongside amino acid metabolites (glutamate, histidine) and lipoprotein-related measures. A classifier distinguishing metastatic from non-metastatic disease (n = 29 vs. 30) achieved an AUC of 0.80. Joint probability analysis in the full cohort preserved cancer-associated signatures across comorbidity burden, with projection-based classification achieving an accuracy of 89.2% (95% CI 85.7-92.6). INTERPRETATION: These findings validate the SCAN1 metabolomic signature in a more clinically complex cohort and indicate that integrating glycomics with metabolomics provides complementary biological information for cancer discrimination. Joint probability analysis provides an interpretable framework for cancer risk stratification within multimorbid diagnostic pathways, supporting the clinical potential of scalable multi-omics blood testing. FUNDING: EPSRC, EU Horizon 2020, Wellcome/MLSTF, Novo Nordisk Foundation.

EBioMedicineVol. 131
Aarhus University (DK), University of Oxford (GB), Culham Science Centre (GB), Ludger (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Regensburg (DE)
Wellcome Trust, Novo Nordisk Fonden, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.