Optimal fire station location for expressways integrating dynamic traffic accessibility and spatially heterogeneous fire risk

Objective Expressway fire incidents are rising, yet dedicated fire stations remain largely absent, forcing reliance on urban services ill-suited to the linear, directional topology of expressways. Existing urban-oriented location models, assuming static travel times and uniform fire risk, fail to capture dynamic congestion and heterogeneous risk profiles in such confined environments. This study develops an optimization framework for expressway fire station siting that integrates dynamic traffic conditions and segment-level risk heterogeneity to minimize response delays and improve post-crash rescue accessibility.Methods In a case study of the Liuyang section of Hangchang Expressway, 1,495 demand points at 150-meter intervals and 10 candidate sites were identified. Fire rescue demand was quantified by combining dynamic travel times from the Baidu Maps API (24 daily intervals) and expert-assigned risk weights for tunnels, ramps, service areas, and general segments. A mixed-integer linear programming model maximized rescue demand satisfaction under constraints on station quantity (N = 1–6) and budget, with layouts solved via a branch-and-bound algorithm and evaluated using 10-minute response coverage as the primary indicator.Results With only existing urban stations (N = 0), no demand points (0%) were accessible within 10 min, most exceeding 30 min. Increasing new stations from 1 to 5 improved 10-minute coverage by 36.22 percentage points and reduced >30-minute points by 11.17 percentage points; marginal gains diminished beyond N = 5. Under a CNY 10 million budget, sites 6 and 7 were deployed, while CNY 20 million favored sites 4, 6, 7, and 8, achieving 39.26% coverage. With N = 3, a CNY 2.5 million budget increase shifted optimal sites from {2, 4, 7} to {4, 6, 7}, narrowing 20-30-minute response segments. Persistent > 30-minute gaps near certain interchanges stemmed from extended U-turn distances due to directional constraints.Conclusions Static, urban-centric layouts are inadequate for expressways, leaving critical coverage gaps. The proposed framework integrates dynamic traffic conditions and heterogeneous risks, enabling resource-efficient siting. For the Liuyang corridor, five optimally sited stations offered the most cost-effective balance. This methodology provides a decision-support tool for authorities to rationalize emergency service layouts, expedite post-crash intervention, and enhance expressway safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Traffic Injury Prevention
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2026.2705413
Primary Topic
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal fire station location for expressways integrating dynamic traffic accessibility and spatially heterogeneous fire risk

Rongwei Bu, Fubin Liu, Liuyuan Xiong, Yao Huang et al.
Traffic Injury Prevention
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
article

Optimal fire station location for expressways integrating dynamic traffic accessibility and spatially heterogeneous fire risk

Rongwei Bu, Fubin Liu, Liuyuan Xiong, Yao Huang, Dingli Liu
article en

Abstract

Objective Expressway fire incidents are rising, yet dedicated fire stations remain largely absent, forcing reliance on urban services ill-suited to the linear, directional topology of expressways. Existing urban-oriented location models, assuming static travel times and uniform fire risk, fail to capture dynamic congestion and heterogeneous risk profiles in such confined environments. This study develops an optimization framework for expressway fire station siting that integrates dynamic traffic conditions and segment-level risk heterogeneity to minimize response delays and improve post-crash rescue accessibility.Methods In a case study of the Liuyang section of Hangchang Expressway, 1,495 demand points at 150-meter intervals and 10 candidate sites were identified. Fire rescue demand was quantified by combining dynamic travel times from the Baidu Maps API (24 daily intervals) and expert-assigned risk weights for tunnels, ramps, service areas, and general segments. A mixed-integer linear programming model maximized rescue demand satisfaction under constraints on station quantity (N = 1–6) and budget, with layouts solved via a branch-and-bound algorithm and evaluated using 10-minute response coverage as the primary indicator.Results With only existing urban stations (N = 0), no demand points (0%) were accessible within 10 min, most exceeding 30 min. Increasing new stations from 1 to 5 improved 10-minute coverage by 36.22 percentage points and reduced >30-minute points by 11.17 percentage points; marginal gains diminished beyond N = 5. Under a CNY 10 million budget, sites 6 and 7 were deployed, while CNY 20 million favored sites 4, 6, 7, and 8, achieving 39.26% coverage. With N = 3, a CNY 2.5 million budget increase shifted optimal sites from {2, 4, 7} to {4, 6, 7}, narrowing 20-30-minute response segments. Persistent > 30-minute gaps near certain interchanges stemmed from extended U-turn distances due to directional constraints.Conclusions Static, urban-centric layouts are inadequate for expressways, leaving critical coverage gaps. The proposed framework integrates dynamic traffic conditions and heterogeneous risks, enabling resource-efficient siting. For the Liuyang corridor, five optimally sited stations offered the most cost-effective balance. This methodology provides a decision-support tool for authorities to rationalize emergency service layouts, expedite post-crash intervention, and enhance expressway safety.

Traffic Injury Prevention
Changsha University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.