Radiofrequency Ablation of the Intraturbinate Posterior Nasal Nerve Versus Medical Treatment for Chronic Rhinitis

Background Medical treatment has been the mainstay of chronic rhinitis management. Meanwhile, innovative minimally invasive nasal surgery has shown promising results. The therapeutic outcomes of these surgical interventions compared with medical treatment in chronic rhinitis have not been discussed previously. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of the inferior turbinate of the intraturbinate segment of the posterior nasal nerve (RAPN) in comparison with intranasal corticosteroid spray (INCS) plus oral antihistamines for the treatment of chronic rhinitis. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with chronic rhinitis who had an inadequate response to medication. Inclusion criteria included a 24-h Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) ≥4 and a rhinorrhea score ≥1. Patients with prior nasal surgeries, caudal septal deviation, or acute/chronic rhinosinusitis were excluded. The primary endpoint was the change in 24-h rTNSS and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores at the 3-month follow-up. Results A total of 64 patients were included: 44 received RAPN, and 20 received INCS. Baseline rTNSS was 7.3 ± 2.1 for RAPN and 6.9 ± 2.3 for INCS ( p = .497). Both groups showed significant improvement in rTNSS and NOSE scores at 1 and 3 months ( p < .001). However, the RAPN group demonstrated significantly greater improvement than the INCS group at 1 to 3 months of follow-up ( p = .001). Subscore analysis revealed that rhinorrhea (at 1 and 3 months) and sneezing (at 1 month) did not differ significantly between groups. One case of postoperative anterior epistaxis was noted in the RAPN group. Conclusions Both INCS and RAPN are highly effective in alleviating chronic rhinitis symptoms. Although RAPN does not establish definitive superiority over medical therapy across all neurogenic domains, it provides comparable, sustained symptom control with the distinct advantage of drug-free maintenance, offering a valuable therapeutic alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924261478358
Primary Topic
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiofrequency Ablation of the Intraturbinate Posterior Nasal Nerve Versus Medical Treatment for Chronic Rhinitis

Ting‐Yu Shih, Jyun‐Yi Liao, Chien‐Yu Huang, Yi-Li Hwang et al.
American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
article

Radiofrequency Ablation of the Intraturbinate Posterior Nasal Nerve Versus Medical Treatment for Chronic Rhinitis

Ting‐Yu Shih, Jyun‐Yi Liao, Chien‐Yu Huang, Yi-Li Hwang, Han-Lo Teng
article en

Abstract

Background Medical treatment has been the mainstay of chronic rhinitis management. Meanwhile, innovative minimally invasive nasal surgery has shown promising results. The therapeutic outcomes of these surgical interventions compared with medical treatment in chronic rhinitis have not been discussed previously. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of the inferior turbinate of the intraturbinate segment of the posterior nasal nerve (RAPN) in comparison with intranasal corticosteroid spray (INCS) plus oral antihistamines for the treatment of chronic rhinitis. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with chronic rhinitis who had an inadequate response to medication. Inclusion criteria included a 24-h Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) ≥4 and a rhinorrhea score ≥1. Patients with prior nasal surgeries, caudal septal deviation, or acute/chronic rhinosinusitis were excluded. The primary endpoint was the change in 24-h rTNSS and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores at the 3-month follow-up. Results A total of 64 patients were included: 44 received RAPN, and 20 received INCS. Baseline rTNSS was 7.3 ± 2.1 for RAPN and 6.9 ± 2.3 for INCS ( p = .497). Both groups showed significant improvement in rTNSS and NOSE scores at 1 and 3 months ( p < .001). However, the RAPN group demonstrated significantly greater improvement than the INCS group at 1 to 3 months of follow-up ( p = .001). Subscore analysis revealed that rhinorrhea (at 1 and 3 months) and sneezing (at 1 month) did not differ significantly between groups. One case of postoperative anterior epistaxis was noted in the RAPN group. Conclusions Both INCS and RAPN are highly effective in alleviating chronic rhinitis symptoms. Although RAPN does not establish definitive superiority over medical therapy across all neurogenic domains, it provides comparable, sustained symptom control with the distinct advantage of drug-free maintenance, offering a valuable therapeutic alternative.

American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Chia-Yi Christian Hospital (TW), Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), National Chin-Yi University of Technology (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.