A Participatory Framework to Assess Agricultural Sustainability: Cover Cropping as an Illustrative Example

Abstract This study developed an analysis‐oriented agricultural sustainability framework to assess how on‐farm biodiversity‐enhancing agricultural practices impact outcome‐based indicators of environmental, economic, and social sustainability. Building on an existing national‐scale agricultural sustainability assessment framework, we adapted it to evaluate farm‐level practices. Using an iterative design, we engaged stakeholders through a farmer survey and workshop to refine indicator selection and ensure contextual relevance. We used biodiversity‐enhancing practices in the Midwestern United States as an illustrative example of how the framework could be applied. Workshop participants were asked to use cover crops as an example to consider how this class of practices affected agricultural sustainability. Our findings highlight that stakeholder engagement during framework development can improve the relevance and specificity of indicator selection, supporting more targeted quantitative analysis for decision‐making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community Science
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025csj000138
Primary Topic
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Participatory Framework to Assess Agricultural Sustainability: Cover Cropping as an Illustrative Example

Alicia Lee, Xin Zhang, Michael J. Castellano, Adam M. Komarek et al.
Community Science
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
article

A Participatory Framework to Assess Agricultural Sustainability: Cover Cropping as an Illustrative Example

Alicia Lee, Xin Zhang, Michael J. Castellano, Adam M. Komarek, Wei Zhang, Kevin Jackson
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study developed an analysis‐oriented agricultural sustainability framework to assess how on‐farm biodiversity‐enhancing agricultural practices impact outcome‐based indicators of environmental, economic, and social sustainability. Building on an existing national‐scale agricultural sustainability assessment framework, we adapted it to evaluate farm‐level practices. Using an iterative design, we engaged stakeholders through a farmer survey and workshop to refine indicator selection and ensure contextual relevance. We used biodiversity‐enhancing practices in the Midwestern United States as an illustrative example of how the framework could be applied. Workshop participants were asked to use cover crops as an example to consider how this class of practices affected agricultural sustainability. Our findings highlight that stakeholder engagement during framework development can improve the relevance and specificity of indicator selection, supporting more targeted quantitative analysis for decision‐making.

Community ScienceVol. 5(3)
University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US), International Food Policy Research Institute (US), The University of Queensland (AU), Iowa State University (US), Department of Primary Industries (AU), Arizona State University (US)
National Science Foundation, Bayer, University of Queensland, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers, Office of International Science and Engineering, Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.