Hemodiafiltration versus High-flux Hemodialysis and Risk of Mortality

Background: Randomized trials suggest that high-volume post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) may improve survival compared with high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but evidence from routine clinical practice and from regions underrepresented in trials remains limited. Methods: We emulated a target trial comparing HDF with high-flux HD using data from EuCliD®, a multinational registry of dialysis patients treated in eight European countries. Adults receiving thrice-weekly in-center dialysis between 2014 and 2019 were eligible. Follow-up began 91 days after dialysis initiation. Sustained treatment strategies were defined as receipt of the assigned modality for at least 90% of sessions. Inverse probability weighting was used to emulate randomized treatment assignment. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, with kidney transplantation treated as a competing event. Results: Among 19,539 eligible patients at day 91, inverse probability weighting created a weighted pseudo-population of 19,758 patients (8,641 HDF; 11,117 HD). During a median follow-up of 16 months (interquartile range 6–32), 4,282 deaths occurred. Hemodiafiltration was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with high-flux HD (hazard ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.67–0.77). At 2 years, the weighted cumulative incidence of death was 20.6% in the HDF group and 22.3% in the HD group, corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 1.7 percentage points. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses, including analyses accounting for country, competing risks, informative censoring, protocol adherence, and an ITT-like exposure definition. The association was broadly similar across prespecified subgroups, with only a stronger relative benefit observed among patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (interaction p<0.001). Higher delivered convective volumes were associated with greater survival benefit; however, these findings should be interpreted cautiously, as higher convective volumes may reflect patient stability and center expertise rather than a causal dose–response relationship. Conclusions: In this large multinational target trial emulation, sustained high-volume post-dilution hemodiafiltration was associated with lower mortality than high-flux hemodialysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000001225
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hemodiafiltration versus High-flux Hemodialysis and Risk of Mortality

Stefano Stuard, Len A. Usvyat, Carmine Zoccali, Bernard Canaud et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Hemodiafiltration versus High-flux Hemodialysis and Risk of Mortality

Stefano Stuard, Len A. Usvyat, Carmine Zoccali, Bernard Canaud, Paola Carioni, Germaine Wong, Franklin W. Maddux, Matteo Savoia, Giovanni Tripepi, Giovanni F. M. Strippoli
article en

Abstract

Background: Randomized trials suggest that high-volume post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) may improve survival compared with high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but evidence from routine clinical practice and from regions underrepresented in trials remains limited. Methods: We emulated a target trial comparing HDF with high-flux HD using data from EuCliD®, a multinational registry of dialysis patients treated in eight European countries. Adults receiving thrice-weekly in-center dialysis between 2014 and 2019 were eligible. Follow-up began 91 days after dialysis initiation. Sustained treatment strategies were defined as receipt of the assigned modality for at least 90% of sessions. Inverse probability weighting was used to emulate randomized treatment assignment. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, with kidney transplantation treated as a competing event. Results: Among 19,539 eligible patients at day 91, inverse probability weighting created a weighted pseudo-population of 19,758 patients (8,641 HDF; 11,117 HD). During a median follow-up of 16 months (interquartile range 6–32), 4,282 deaths occurred. Hemodiafiltration was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with high-flux HD (hazard ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.67–0.77). At 2 years, the weighted cumulative incidence of death was 20.6% in the HDF group and 22.3% in the HD group, corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 1.7 percentage points. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses, including analyses accounting for country, competing risks, informative censoring, protocol adherence, and an ITT-like exposure definition. The association was broadly similar across prespecified subgroups, with only a stronger relative benefit observed among patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (interaction p<0.001). Higher delivered convective volumes were associated with greater survival benefit; however, these findings should be interpreted cautiously, as higher convective volumes may reflect patient stability and center expertise rather than a causal dose–response relationship. Conclusions: In this large multinational target trial emulation, sustained high-volume post-dilution hemodiafiltration was associated with lower mortality than high-flux hemodialysis.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
The University of Sydney (AU), Université de Montpellier (FR), Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica (IT), Renal Research Institute (US), Fresenius Medical Care (United States) (US), Fresenius Medical Care North America (United States) (US), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), University of Reggio Calabria (IT), Fresenius Medical Care (Germany) (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.