Impact of a diagnostic strategy for appendicitis in children with acute abdominal pain in primary care: study protocol for a hybrid type 1 cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Children with acute abdominal pain pose a diagnostic challenge for general practitioners (GPs), as it can be difficult to distinguish appendicitis from self-limiting conditions due to overlapping symptoms. To support GPs, a diagnostic strategy for appendicitis was developed that integrates an externally validated prediction rule with C-reactive protein point-of-care testing (CRP POCT) and risk-based management advice. This study will compare the impact of this diagnostic strategy to usual care in children with acute abdominal pain in primary care in terms of: (i) clinical effectiveness, (ii) cost-effectiveness, and (iii) implementation potential. METHODS: We will conduct a pragmatic, hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation, cluster randomised controlled trial in Dutch general practice. Children aged 4-18 years with acute (≤ 7 days) abdominal pain will be included. GP practices will be randomly allocated to either: (i) use of the diagnostic strategy for appendicitis, or (ii) usual care. In the intervention group, children are stratified into low, medium, or high risk for appendicitis based on a seven-item prediction rule including symptoms and signs. Management advice is tailored to appendicitis risk: safety netting for low-risk, immediate referral for high-risk, or CRP POCT for medium-risk (CRP < 10 mg/L: safety netting; CRP 10-50 mg/L: reassessment or immediate referral (based on GPs' clinical judgement and parent/child preference); CRP ≥ 50 mg/L: immediate referral). The primary outcome is referral efficiency (proportion of non-referrals amongst patients with no appendicitis during 30 days follow-up). Secondary outcomes include safety, proportion of children with CRP POCT, proportion of children with planned reassessment, child anxiety, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and costs. A parallel process evaluation will assess implementation outcomes, including the reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the diagnostic strategy. We aim to include 566 children without appendicitis to determine an improvement of efficiency from 88% to 95%. DISCUSSION: We hypothesise that use of the diagnostic strategy will reduce referrals without increasing delayed diagnoses of appendicitis, compared to usual care in children presenting with acute abdominal pain in primary care. This may ultimately result in better patient outcomes, lower costs, and reduced health care resource use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06762275 (registration date: 2024/12/03).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-026-00234-x
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of a diagnostic strategy for appendicitis in children with acute abdominal pain in primary care: study protocol for a hybrid type 1 cluster randomised controlled trial

P. Chris Tromp, Albert Holvast, Michiel R. de Boer, Gera Welker et al.
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Impact of a diagnostic strategy for appendicitis in children with acute abdominal pain in primary care: study protocol for a hybrid type 1 cluster randomised controlled trial

P. Chris Tromp, Albert Holvast, Michiel R. de Boer, Gera Welker, Guus Blok, Elyne Deuring, Daan P. Hurkmans, Roeland Watjer, Gea A. Holtman, Huibert Burger, Esmee M. Hogervorst, Roderick P Venekamp, Grietje E. Knol‐de Vries, Jan B.F. Hulscher, Arne R.M. van der Bilt, Ramon R. Gorter, Tamara N Platteel, Sven J.G. Geelen, Esen Doganer, Karin M. Vermeulen, Meefa Hogenes, Eric Hiddink, Eline J.A.Q. Naber, Marjolein Y. Berger, Chantal M.C.R. Everts-Panman, Mattijs E. Numans
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children with acute abdominal pain pose a diagnostic challenge for general practitioners (GPs), as it can be difficult to distinguish appendicitis from self-limiting conditions due to overlapping symptoms. To support GPs, a diagnostic strategy for appendicitis was developed that integrates an externally validated prediction rule with C-reactive protein point-of-care testing (CRP POCT) and risk-based management advice. This study will compare the impact of this diagnostic strategy to usual care in children with acute abdominal pain in primary care in terms of: (i) clinical effectiveness, (ii) cost-effectiveness, and (iii) implementation potential. METHODS: We will conduct a pragmatic, hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation, cluster randomised controlled trial in Dutch general practice. Children aged 4-18 years with acute (≤ 7 days) abdominal pain will be included. GP practices will be randomly allocated to either: (i) use of the diagnostic strategy for appendicitis, or (ii) usual care. In the intervention group, children are stratified into low, medium, or high risk for appendicitis based on a seven-item prediction rule including symptoms and signs. Management advice is tailored to appendicitis risk: safety netting for low-risk, immediate referral for high-risk, or CRP POCT for medium-risk (CRP < 10 mg/L: safety netting; CRP 10-50 mg/L: reassessment or immediate referral (based on GPs' clinical judgement and parent/child preference); CRP ≥ 50 mg/L: immediate referral). The primary outcome is referral efficiency (proportion of non-referrals amongst patients with no appendicitis during 30 days follow-up). Secondary outcomes include safety, proportion of children with CRP POCT, proportion of children with planned reassessment, child anxiety, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and costs. A parallel process evaluation will assess implementation outcomes, including the reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the diagnostic strategy. We aim to include 566 children without appendicitis to determine an improvement of efficiency from 88% to 95%. DISCUSSION: We hypothesise that use of the diagnostic strategy will reduce referrals without increasing delayed diagnoses of appendicitis, compared to usual care in children presenting with acute abdominal pain in primary care. This may ultimately result in better patient outcomes, lower costs, and reduced health care resource use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06762275 (registration date: 2024/12/03).

Diagnostic and Prognostic ResearchVol. 10(1)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Hanze University of Applied Sciences (NL), Utrecht University (NL), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Hanoi Open University (VN), Martini Ziekenhuis (NL), Stichting Kind en Groei (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Wilhelmina Children's Hospital (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
ZonMw
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.