Reason for Using Frequency and Percentage to Analyse Data Regardless of the Degree and Reason for Using Benchmark of 50% to Analyse Data Collected from both Non-Likert and Likert Scale Regardless of the Degree

This article examines the rationale behind using frequency and percentage as primary analytical tools for categorical data in descriptive research. The discussion establishes that categorical data, being nominal in nature, necessitates analytical approaches distinct from those used for continuous or interval data. Frequency and percentage distributions provide intuitive, accessible, and meaningful summaries of how cases are distributed across categories. The article further explores the justification for employing a 50% benchmark in interpreting survey responses, drawing connections to established research practices. The analysis demonstrates that these descriptive statistics are not merely convenient but are methodologically appropriate for addressing research questions involving categorical variables.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21920732
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reason for Using Frequency and Percentage to Analyse Data Regardless of the Degree and Reason for Using Benchmark of 50% to Analyse Data Collected from both Non-Likert and Likert Scale Regardless of the Degree

Haruna, Y., Segun
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Reason for Using Frequency and Percentage to Analyse Data Regardless of the Degree and Reason for Using Benchmark of 50% to Analyse Data Collected from both Non-Likert and Likert Scale Regardless of the Degree

Haruna, Y., Segun
article en

Abstract

This article examines the rationale behind using frequency and percentage as primary analytical tools for categorical data in descriptive research. The discussion establishes that categorical data, being nominal in nature, necessitates analytical approaches distinct from those used for continuous or interval data. Frequency and percentage distributions provide intuitive, accessible, and meaningful summaries of how cases are distributed across categories. The article further explores the justification for employing a 50% benchmark in interpreting survey responses, drawing connections to established research practices. The analysis demonstrates that these descriptive statistics are not merely convenient but are methodologically appropriate for addressing research questions involving categorical variables.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.