Digital Decisions: Enhancing Chronic Disease Self-Care Through Digital Health and AI-Enhanced Decision-Making

Unlabelled: Advances in digital health have dramatically changed how patients engage with their health. Rather than relying solely on periodic clinical visits, patients now have access to smartphones, patient portals, wearable devices, and mobile apps that provide support for day-to-day self-care decisions. This commentary discusses the findings of Longhini et al's systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of digital health interventions, which found modest improvements in self-care monitoring but limited effects on self-care maintenance and management behaviors. Reflecting on these findings through the lens of dual-process theory, digital health technologies appear to be effective at supporting fast, intuitive processes, such as symptom monitoring, but are less effective at engaging slower, deliberative processes needed for complex decision-making and behavior change. Digital health technologies should evolve from primarily supporting routine self-care activities to enhancing patients' reflective decision-making processes for sustained behavior change. Emerging AI capabilities offer opportunities to strengthen and bridge these fast and slow cognitive processes by translating complex health information into actionable insights and facilitating patient-clinician communication. Realizing this potential requires careful attention to implementation, including integration into clinical workflows, patient and clinician education, and digital literacy. In addition, digital health teams should adopt standardized implementation frameworks and outcome measures to generate a more robust evidence base. Lastly, human-centered design, patient engagement, and safeguards addressing bias, privacy, and transparency are foundational to ensure that the rapid pace of digital health technology will continue to enhance patient self-care and health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/106648
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Decisions: Enhancing Chronic Disease Self-Care Through Digital Health and AI-Enhanced Decision-Making

Donna M. Zulman, Ashley C Griffin
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Digital Decisions: Enhancing Chronic Disease Self-Care Through Digital Health and AI-Enhanced Decision-Making

Donna M. Zulman, Ashley C Griffin
article en

Abstract

Unlabelled: Advances in digital health have dramatically changed how patients engage with their health. Rather than relying solely on periodic clinical visits, patients now have access to smartphones, patient portals, wearable devices, and mobile apps that provide support for day-to-day self-care decisions. This commentary discusses the findings of Longhini et al's systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of digital health interventions, which found modest improvements in self-care monitoring but limited effects on self-care maintenance and management behaviors. Reflecting on these findings through the lens of dual-process theory, digital health technologies appear to be effective at supporting fast, intuitive processes, such as symptom monitoring, but are less effective at engaging slower, deliberative processes needed for complex decision-making and behavior change. Digital health technologies should evolve from primarily supporting routine self-care activities to enhancing patients' reflective decision-making processes for sustained behavior change. Emerging AI capabilities offer opportunities to strengthen and bridge these fast and slow cognitive processes by translating complex health information into actionable insights and facilitating patient-clinician communication. Realizing this potential requires careful attention to implementation, including integration into clinical workflows, patient and clinician education, and digital literacy. In addition, digital health teams should adopt standardized implementation frameworks and outcome measures to generate a more robust evidence base. Lastly, human-centered design, patient engagement, and safeguards addressing bias, privacy, and transparency are foundational to ensure that the rapid pace of digital health technology will continue to enhance patient self-care and health outcomes.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 28
VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US), Stanford Health Care (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Stanford University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.