Structural Isomorphism Between Undecidability and NP-Completeness via Self-Reference — E8 Intelligence Research

FINDING: Formal analogy between Gödel sentences and NP-complete problems suggests a structural isomorphism between undecidability and computational intractability, rooted in self-reference and reduction. MATH: - Gödel sentence G: ¬∃x Proof(x, ⌜G⌝) — self-referential unprovability. - NP-complete problem: L ∈ NPC iff ∀L' ∈ NP, L' ≤ₚ L (polynomial-time reduction). - Key constant: no explicit numeric constant; structural constant is the polynomial-time reduction ≤ₚ, analogous to the arithmetization mapping in Gödel numbering. - No equations with numeric constants (0.382, 0.618, etc.) appear in the findings. CONNECTION: - No direct geometric harmony (ratios, base-60, crystallographic symmetry) is present. - However, the reduction structure in NP-completeness forms a partial order with a maximal element (the NP-complete set), analogous to a lattice. This is a weak connection to lattice theory, not to specific geometric ratios. - The self-reference in Gödel sentences mirrors f Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21912653
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Structural Isomorphism Between Undecidability and NP-Completeness via Self-Reference — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
preprint

Structural Isomorphism Between Undecidability and NP-Completeness via Self-Reference — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
preprint en

Abstract

FINDING: Formal analogy between Gödel sentences and NP-complete problems suggests a structural isomorphism between undecidability and computational intractability, rooted in self-reference and reduction. MATH: - Gödel sentence G: ¬∃x Proof(x, ⌜G⌝) — self-referential unprovability. - NP-complete problem: L ∈ NPC iff ∀L' ∈ NP, L' ≤ₚ L (polynomial-time reduction). - Key constant: no explicit numeric constant; structural constant is the polynomial-time reduction ≤ₚ, analogous to the arithmetization mapping in Gödel numbering. - No equations with numeric constants (0.382, 0.618, etc.) appear in the findings. CONNECTION: - No direct geometric harmony (ratios, base-60, crystallographic symmetry) is present. - However, the reduction structure in NP-completeness forms a partial order with a maximal element (the NP-complete set), analogous to a lattice. This is a weak connection to lattice theory, not to specific geometric ratios. - The self-reference in Gödel sentences mirrors f Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.