DOGE and the Modern Czar: Executive Power, Accountability, and the Trump Administration

Soon after President Donald Trump created the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), controversy arose over its aggressive cost-cutting and broad authority across federal agencies. The effort was led by Elon Musk, raising constitutional questions about whether a non-vetted, non-Senate-confirmed figure chosen by the president can wield sweeping policy, regulatory, and spending power. This paper briefly defines the “czar” concept and traces its historical roots. It then examines the development of DOGE and evaluates whether Musk and the agency fit the czar model. We analyze the political and institutional forces behind its creation and argue that DOGE reflects a broader trend toward the centralization of executive authority and push for expansive presidential control. Finally, we analyze how Trump leveraged DOGE’s proximity to the White House to evade accountability and therefore provide room to centralize presidential power while reshaping the federal government.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Congress & the Presidency
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07343469.2026.2642720
Primary Topic
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DOGE and the Modern Czar: Executive Power, Accountability, and the Trump Administration

Mark J. Rozell, Mitchel A. Sollenberger
Congress & the Presidency
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
article

DOGE and the Modern Czar: Executive Power, Accountability, and the Trump Administration

Mark J. Rozell, Mitchel A. Sollenberger
article en

Abstract

Soon after President Donald Trump created the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), controversy arose over its aggressive cost-cutting and broad authority across federal agencies. The effort was led by Elon Musk, raising constitutional questions about whether a non-vetted, non-Senate-confirmed figure chosen by the president can wield sweeping policy, regulatory, and spending power. This paper briefly defines the “czar” concept and traces its historical roots. It then examines the development of DOGE and evaluates whether Musk and the agency fit the czar model. We analyze the political and institutional forces behind its creation and argue that DOGE reflects a broader trend toward the centralization of executive authority and push for expansive presidential control. Finally, we analyze how Trump leveraged DOGE’s proximity to the White House to evade accountability and therefore provide room to centralize presidential power while reshaping the federal government.

Congress & the Presidency
George Mason University (US), University of Michigan–Dearborn (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.