SpaceFlight-Clinical-AI-Benchmarks: An Edge-Native Evaluation Framework for NASA ACHS and Deep Space Operations

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the NASA Autonomous Crew Healthcare System (ACHS) presents unprecedented opportunities for deep space medical support. However, standard LLM evaluation benchmarks fail to account for the unique operational constraints of spaceflight, namely extreme communication latency, edge-native hardware limitations, and the severe physiological hazards of the aerospace environment. In this paper, we introduce the SpaceFlight-Clinical-AI-Benchmarks, the first open-source, offline evaluation framework designed specifically for aerospace medicine. We present a novel evaluation methodology featuring a hard-gate safety multiplier that strictly penalizes AI models for recommending contraindications in high-stakes scenarios such as microgravity-induced arrhythmias and acute radiation sickness. Our pipeline demonstrates that by evaluating models exclusively in zero-connectivity edge environments, we can accurately measure their viability for autonomous clinical decision support during deep space transit.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21920929
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

SpaceFlight-Clinical-AI-Benchmarks: An Edge-Native Evaluation Framework for NASA ACHS and Deep Space Operations

Mohammad Al Kharabsheh
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
preprint

SpaceFlight-Clinical-AI-Benchmarks: An Edge-Native Evaluation Framework for NASA ACHS and Deep Space Operations

Mohammad Al Kharabsheh
preprint en

Abstract

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the NASA Autonomous Crew Healthcare System (ACHS) presents unprecedented opportunities for deep space medical support. However, standard LLM evaluation benchmarks fail to account for the unique operational constraints of spaceflight, namely extreme communication latency, edge-native hardware limitations, and the severe physiological hazards of the aerospace environment. In this paper, we introduce the SpaceFlight-Clinical-AI-Benchmarks, the first open-source, offline evaluation framework designed specifically for aerospace medicine. We present a novel evaluation methodology featuring a hard-gate safety multiplier that strictly penalizes AI models for recommending contraindications in high-stakes scenarios such as microgravity-induced arrhythmias and acute radiation sickness. Our pipeline demonstrates that by evaluating models exclusively in zero-connectivity edge environments, we can accurately measure their viability for autonomous clinical decision support during deep space transit.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SpaceFlight-Clinical-AI-Benchmarks: An Edge-Native Evaluation Framework for NASA ACHS and Deep Space Operations — Mohammad Al Kharabsheh · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS