Assessment of sperm morphology in bulls, rams and humans: Classification systems, standardisation, and the application of machine learning

Sperm morphology is a critical predictor of fertility across a range of species; however, its assessment remains inherently subjective and thus susceptible to variability and inaccuracy. Morphological abnormalities can present in diverse forms, with over 25 distinct categories recognised in the current literature. These abnormalities may arise during spermatogenesis due to stressors, as well as post-maturation during epididymal storage, ejaculation, or as a consequence of suboptimal handling during processing. Researchers have long sought to characterise these abnormalities through classification systems. Numerous classification frameworks have been developed to categorise observed defects. However, inconsistencies in the classification of specific abnormalities have led to disputes among experts. Preferences for particular classification schemes vary among laboratories, species, industries, and geographic regions, resulting in a lack of standardisation that hampers comparability and contributes to considerable inter- and intra-observer variability. While advancements in automation have begun to emerge, subjective visual assessment remains the predominant method of evaluation. This reliance, combined with inconsistent classification standards, absence of formal training, and inherent human bias, continues to drive substantial variability. In response, recent research has turned to novel technologies such as machine learning to achieve objective, scalable assessment. However, training these models necessitates high-quality training data –something difficult to obtain given the challenges of standardising subjective assessments. To preserve the utility of sperm morphology as a useful indicator of fertility, it is essential that future efforts focus on improving assessor training and standardisation protocols, thereby reducing variability while the development of automated, objective technologies continues to progress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Reproduction Science
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2026.108309
Primary Topic
Sperm and Testicular Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of sperm morphology in bulls, rams and humans: Classification systems, standardisation, and the application of machine learning

Jessica P. Rickard, G. de, Katherine Rose Seymour
Animal Reproduction Science
Sperm and Testicular Function
article

Assessment of sperm morphology in bulls, rams and humans: Classification systems, standardisation, and the application of machine learning

Jessica P. Rickard, G. de, Katherine Rose Seymour
article en

Abstract

Sperm morphology is a critical predictor of fertility across a range of species; however, its assessment remains inherently subjective and thus susceptible to variability and inaccuracy. Morphological abnormalities can present in diverse forms, with over 25 distinct categories recognised in the current literature. These abnormalities may arise during spermatogenesis due to stressors, as well as post-maturation during epididymal storage, ejaculation, or as a consequence of suboptimal handling during processing. Researchers have long sought to characterise these abnormalities through classification systems. Numerous classification frameworks have been developed to categorise observed defects. However, inconsistencies in the classification of specific abnormalities have led to disputes among experts. Preferences for particular classification schemes vary among laboratories, species, industries, and geographic regions, resulting in a lack of standardisation that hampers comparability and contributes to considerable inter- and intra-observer variability. While advancements in automation have begun to emerge, subjective visual assessment remains the predominant method of evaluation. This reliance, combined with inconsistent classification standards, absence of formal training, and inherent human bias, continues to drive substantial variability. In response, recent research has turned to novel technologies such as machine learning to achieve objective, scalable assessment. However, training these models necessitates high-quality training data –something difficult to obtain given the challenges of standardising subjective assessments. To preserve the utility of sperm morphology as a useful indicator of fertility, it is essential that future efforts focus on improving assessor training and standardisation protocols, thereby reducing variability while the development of automated, objective technologies continues to progress.

Animal Reproduction ScienceVol. 293
The University of Sydney (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sperm and Testicular Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.