Facilitating advance care planning in oncology: study protocol for the evaluation of a tailored implementation of an advance care planning tool (the INDEED study)

Abstract Background Advance care planning (ACP) improves patient outcomes, but integration of ACP in daily practice for patients with cancer in hospitals remains suboptimal. Systematic implementation of tools to facilitate ACP could overcome the barriers for ACP. In this study we will evaluate the multifaceted tailored implementation of a digital ACP tool embedded in the electronic health record (EHR) in daily clinical cancer care. We will analyse the implementation process, its effect on use of the ACP tool, and the impact of use of the tool on healthcare use and healthcare costs. Methods We will perform a multicentre, convergent mixed-methods implementation study. The digital ACP tool supports healthcare professionals in conducting and documenting ACP conversations, and sharing this documentation with colleagues within and outside the hospital. The implementation will encompass four phases guided by the Implementation of Change model: 1) diagnostic analysis; 2) tailored implementation protocol development; 3) protocol implementation and testing; and 4) evaluation of the implementation process and its effects. We will evaluate both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the implementation process. Additionally, use of the tool and its impact on in-hospital healthcare use in the last three months of life and associated costs are measured. Discussion This study will provide knowledge on how to effectively implement ACP in routine care in hospitals for patients with cancer, by identifying effective implementation strategies. Furthermore, it will give insight in the effect of integration of ACP conversations in daily clinical care on healthcare use of patients with cancer in the last three months of life and the associated costs. Trial registration This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06350968, Registration date: April 8, 2024).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Palliative Care
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02285-9
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facilitating advance care planning in oncology: study protocol for the evaluation of a tailored implementation of an advance care planning tool (the INDEED study)

Wendy H. Oldenmenger, Annemieke van der Padt‐Pruijsten, I Korfage, Carin C.D. van der Rijt et al.
BMC Palliative Care
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Facilitating advance care planning in oncology: study protocol for the evaluation of a tailored implementation of an advance care planning tool (the INDEED study)

Wendy H. Oldenmenger, Annemieke van der Padt‐Pruijsten, I Korfage, Carin C.D. van der Rijt, Joica A M Benschop, Agnes van der Heide
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Advance care planning (ACP) improves patient outcomes, but integration of ACP in daily practice for patients with cancer in hospitals remains suboptimal. Systematic implementation of tools to facilitate ACP could overcome the barriers for ACP. In this study we will evaluate the multifaceted tailored implementation of a digital ACP tool embedded in the electronic health record (EHR) in daily clinical cancer care. We will analyse the implementation process, its effect on use of the ACP tool, and the impact of use of the tool on healthcare use and healthcare costs. Methods We will perform a multicentre, convergent mixed-methods implementation study. The digital ACP tool supports healthcare professionals in conducting and documenting ACP conversations, and sharing this documentation with colleagues within and outside the hospital. The implementation will encompass four phases guided by the Implementation of Change model: 1) diagnostic analysis; 2) tailored implementation protocol development; 3) protocol implementation and testing; and 4) evaluation of the implementation process and its effects. We will evaluate both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the implementation process. Additionally, use of the tool and its impact on in-hospital healthcare use in the last three months of life and associated costs are measured. Discussion This study will provide knowledge on how to effectively implement ACP in routine care in hospitals for patients with cancer, by identifying effective implementation strategies. Furthermore, it will give insight in the effect of integration of ACP conversations in daily clinical care on healthcare use of patients with cancer in the last three months of life and the associated costs. Trial registration This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06350968, Registration date: April 8, 2024).

BMC Palliative Care
Erasmus MC (NL), Maasstad Ziekenhuis (NL), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
ZonMw
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.