Opportunities for pathways approaches for adapting to complex climate change risks

Adaptation planning is increasingly challenged under conditions of complex climate change risks, which are characterized by the dynamic interactions between compounding hazards, cascading impacts, governance failures, and multiple drivers of vulnerabilities, producing non-linear impacts and frequently irreversible outcomes. Pathways approaches have seen growing application over the past decade and a half to support adaptation planning by structuring sequences of adaptation options that can be adjusted depending on how the future unfolds as risk conditions evolve. While valuable for managing uncertainty and avoiding lock-in, more limited attention has been given to how pathways can support adaptation to cascading impacts, cross-sectoral interdependencies, and rapidly evolving non-linear risk conditions associated with complex climate change risks. In this article, we identify opportunities for pathways approaches to support adaptation to complex climate change risks. By synthesizing recent advances, emerging challenges, and future research directions across three domains of research, namely collaborative learning, overshoot, and transformational recovery after loss and damage, we position how the iterative learning, flexibility, and governance orientation of pathways approaches can be extended to address the distinctive adaptation demands that complex climate change risks generate. These demands include epistemic complexity and contested decision-making, non-linear risk conditions and irreversible system change under overshoot conditions, and recovery lock-in under escalating loss and damage. By integrating these literatures, we articulate ways forward and a research agenda for extending pathways approaches as governance mechanisms to support more inclusive, flexible, and resilient adaptation to complex climate change risks in the decades ahead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2026.101721
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opportunities for pathways approaches for adapting to complex climate change risks

Michael Hagenlocher, Edward Sparkes, S.E. Werners, Greta Dekker et al.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

Opportunities for pathways approaches for adapting to complex climate change risks

Michael Hagenlocher, Edward Sparkes, S.E. Werners, Greta Dekker, Olasunkanmi Habeeb Okunola, Himanshu Shekhar
article en

Abstract

Adaptation planning is increasingly challenged under conditions of complex climate change risks, which are characterized by the dynamic interactions between compounding hazards, cascading impacts, governance failures, and multiple drivers of vulnerabilities, producing non-linear impacts and frequently irreversible outcomes. Pathways approaches have seen growing application over the past decade and a half to support adaptation planning by structuring sequences of adaptation options that can be adjusted depending on how the future unfolds as risk conditions evolve. While valuable for managing uncertainty and avoiding lock-in, more limited attention has been given to how pathways can support adaptation to cascading impacts, cross-sectoral interdependencies, and rapidly evolving non-linear risk conditions associated with complex climate change risks. In this article, we identify opportunities for pathways approaches to support adaptation to complex climate change risks. By synthesizing recent advances, emerging challenges, and future research directions across three domains of research, namely collaborative learning, overshoot, and transformational recovery after loss and damage, we position how the iterative learning, flexibility, and governance orientation of pathways approaches can be extended to address the distinctive adaptation demands that complex climate change risks generate. These demands include epistemic complexity and contested decision-making, non-linear risk conditions and irreversible system change under overshoot conditions, and recovery lock-in under escalating loss and damage. By integrating these literatures, we articulate ways forward and a research agenda for extending pathways approaches as governance mechanisms to support more inclusive, flexible, and resilient adaptation to complex climate change risks in the decades ahead.

Current Opinion in Environmental SustainabilityVol. 83
United Nations (US), United Nations University (DE), Royal Roads University (CA), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Australian Government, European Commission, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australian Government, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.