A comparative assessment of online GNSS processing services for geodetic control: insights from the ethiopian network

Abstract This study compares four online GNSS processing services AUSPOS, TrimbleRTX, OPUS, and CSRS-PPP using 72-h static GNSS data from 12 geodetic control stations in Ethiopia. Observations collected with a Leica GS10 receiver were processed by each service and evaluated against a high-precision BERNESE reference solution. One-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences in mean coordinates at the 95 % confidence level ( p > 0.05). However, practical precision varied notably among services, with coordinate discrepancies ranging from millimeter-level agreement to maximum differences of 44 mm (X), 30 mm (Y), and 20 mm (Z) between service pairs. CSRS-PPP and AUSPOS showed the closest agreement with the reference (mean 3D differences of 1.0 cm and 2.1 cm, respectively), while TrimbleRTX exhibited consistent systematic biases requiring datum transformation. Although statistically comparable, CSRS-PPP and AUSPOS are recommended for high-accuracy geodetic applications due to their superior consistency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2026-0018
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative assessment of online GNSS processing services for geodetic control: insights from the ethiopian network

Andenet A. Gedamu, Sintayehu Abie Dires, Gedamu Amare Behonagn, Sisay Walelign Dagnachew
Journal of Applied Geodesy
GNSS positioning and interference
article

A comparative assessment of online GNSS processing services for geodetic control: insights from the ethiopian network

Andenet A. Gedamu, Sintayehu Abie Dires, Gedamu Amare Behonagn, Sisay Walelign Dagnachew
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study compares four online GNSS processing services AUSPOS, TrimbleRTX, OPUS, and CSRS-PPP using 72-h static GNSS data from 12 geodetic control stations in Ethiopia. Observations collected with a Leica GS10 receiver were processed by each service and evaluated against a high-precision BERNESE reference solution. One-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences in mean coordinates at the 95 % confidence level ( p > 0.05). However, practical precision varied notably among services, with coordinate discrepancies ranging from millimeter-level agreement to maximum differences of 44 mm (X), 30 mm (Y), and 20 mm (Z) between service pairs. CSRS-PPP and AUSPOS showed the closest agreement with the reference (mean 3D differences of 1.0 cm and 2.1 cm, respectively), while TrimbleRTX exhibited consistent systematic biases requiring datum transformation. Although statistically comparable, CSRS-PPP and AUSPOS are recommended for high-accuracy geodetic applications due to their superior consistency.

Journal of Applied Geodesy
Bule Hora University (ET), Addis Ababa Science and Technology University (ET), Addis Ababa University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
GNSS positioning and interference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative assessment of online GNSS processing services for geodetic control: insights from the ethiopian network — Andenet A. Gedamu, Sintayehu Abie Dires, et al. · Journal of Applied Geodesy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS