Retrospective narratives of COVID-19 experiences: a qualitative study of written accounts by people in public in the context of a performative intervention

BACKGROUND: This qualitative study explored how people retrospectively described their experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic. It aimed how these experiences are remembered and interpreted over time. METHODS: A qualitative study design was employed, based on short texts written by members of the public during a performative intervention in public space. The texts were thematically analyzed to identify common experiences and emotions. RESULTS: The findings show that participants described the pandemic not only as a health crisis but also as a major social and emotional challenge. Feelings of fear, uncertainty, and loss of control were common, alongside attempts to find meaning and emotional stability. Narratives also suggest that the ability to reflect on the pandemic as a period of adaptation or personal growth depended on access to stable resources such as housing, social support, and digital connectivity. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the study highlights that how the pandemic is remembered is closely linked to social conditions, underlining the importance of inclusive and reflective approaches to understanding the long-term impacts of COVID-19. In addition, it demonstrates that social inequalities in both the interpretation of past crises and the development of inclusive strategies are important for future public health response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28976-9
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrospective narratives of COVID-19 experiences: a qualitative study of written accounts by people in public in the context of a performative intervention

Patrick Brzoska, Yüce Yılmaz-Aslan, T Neugebauer, Maren Schuster et al.
BMC Public Health
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Retrospective narratives of COVID-19 experiences: a qualitative study of written accounts by people in public in the context of a performative intervention

Patrick Brzoska, Yüce Yılmaz-Aslan, T Neugebauer, Maren Schuster, Amand Führer, Franziska Waldschmitt, Anne Marx
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This qualitative study explored how people retrospectively described their experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic. It aimed how these experiences are remembered and interpreted over time. METHODS: A qualitative study design was employed, based on short texts written by members of the public during a performative intervention in public space. The texts were thematically analyzed to identify common experiences and emotions. RESULTS: The findings show that participants described the pandemic not only as a health crisis but also as a major social and emotional challenge. Feelings of fear, uncertainty, and loss of control were common, alongside attempts to find meaning and emotional stability. Narratives also suggest that the ability to reflect on the pandemic as a period of adaptation or personal growth depended on access to stable resources such as housing, social support, and digital connectivity. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the study highlights that how the pandemic is remembered is closely linked to social conditions, underlining the importance of inclusive and reflective approaches to understanding the long-term impacts of COVID-19. In addition, it demonstrates that social inequalities in both the interpretation of past crises and the development of inclusive strategies are important for future public health response.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
Witten/Herdecke University (DE), Knowledge Unlatched (Germany) (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Volkswagen Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.