Testing the Effectiveness of Using Psychology-Intuitive Information to Promote Responsible AI: Information About the Training Set Shapes Perceptions of AI Algorithms in an Experimental Setting

Most of the tools currently available to promote responsible AI take a top-down approach, overlooking the role of intuitive perceptions of end users. However, emerging evidence shows that end users have preferences for specific algorithms, highlighting an alternative way to promote responsible AI. Nevertheless, the large number of elements impacting the performance and reliability of AI algorithms makes aligning end-users’ intuitions with the actual characteristics of these algorithms particularly challenging. In this paper, we propose building on decades of psychological research to identify which information that is important from a technical perspective can also be used intuitively by individuals. Through a set of five studies involving over 1,000 participants, we demonstrate that providing information about the quantity and quality of an algorithm’s training set can align end-users’ perceptions with the actual reliability of AI algorithms, thereby offering a new tool to promote responsible AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2718612
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the Effectiveness of Using Psychology-Intuitive Information to Promote Responsible AI: Information About the Training Set Shapes Perceptions of AI Algorithms in an Experimental Setting

Christine Balagué, Lou Safra, Léa Antonicelli
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Testing the Effectiveness of Using Psychology-Intuitive Information to Promote Responsible AI: Information About the Training Set Shapes Perceptions of AI Algorithms in an Experimental Setting

Christine Balagué, Lou Safra, Léa Antonicelli
article en

Abstract

Most of the tools currently available to promote responsible AI take a top-down approach, overlooking the role of intuitive perceptions of end users. However, emerging evidence shows that end users have preferences for specific algorithms, highlighting an alternative way to promote responsible AI. Nevertheless, the large number of elements impacting the performance and reliability of AI algorithms makes aligning end-users’ intuitions with the actual characteristics of these algorithms particularly challenging. In this paper, we propose building on decades of psychological research to identify which information that is important from a technical perspective can also be used intuitively by individuals. Through a set of five studies involving over 1,000 participants, we demonstrate that providing information about the quantity and quality of an algorithm’s training set can align end-users’ perceptions with the actual reliability of AI algorithms, thereby offering a new tool to promote responsible AI.

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Institut Mines-Télécom (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), École Normale Supérieure (BI), Centre de Recherches Politiques de Sciences Po (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Testing the Effectiveness of Using Psychology-Intuitive Information to Promote Responsible AI: Information About the Training Set Shapes Perceptions of AI Algorithms in an Experimental Setting — Christine Balagué, Lou Safra, et al. · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS