A Contact-Integrated Impulse-Transfer Index for Front Kicks Under a Carried-Load Condition in Military Cadets

Effective mass reflects the body mass mechanically coupled during impact. Acceleration-based effective-mass estimates require noise-sensitive differentiation of segment kinematics. This study introduced a new operational index, the contact-integrated impulse-transfer index (ITI; the ratio of contact impulse to pre-impact foot velocity) and evaluated its reliability, agreement with an acceleration-based effective-mass estimate (Me,acc), and sensitivity to a carried-load condition. Forty male military cadets performed five maximal front kicks onto a force plate synchronized with three-dimensional motion capture under two fixed-order conditions: barefoot without load and with 30 kg of carried equipment. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients; condition differences using paired tests with effect sizes and false-discovery-rate correction; method agreement using correlations, ICCs, and Bland–Altman analysis; and isokinetic strength interactions using body-mass-adjusted mixed-effects models. ITI showed poor-to-moderate single-kick reliability (ICC = 0.46–0.52) but good reliability for the five-kick mean (ICC = 0.83–0.87). It was higher with than without the carried load (26.18 ± 5.20 vs. 21.72 ± 5.05 kg; p < 0.001; dz = 1.07), which, by definition, corresponded to a 23% greater net impulse with unchanged pre-impact foot velocity. Net impulse alone was more reliable (single-kick ICC = 0.75; five-kick mean ICC = 0.95) and showed a larger load effect (dz = 1.39) than ITI. Contact duration increased, peak force decreased, and the force–time profile appeared more push-like under load. In a subsample with usable impact-phase marker trajectories (n = 20), ITI and Me,acc were not significantly correlated (r = 0.06, p = 0.69) and showed negligible agreement (ICC = 0.01; Bland–Altman bias = −20.6 kg). The condition × strength interactions for concentric hip-rotator strength did not remain significant after Bonferroni correction (adjusted p = 0.067–0.096). Averaged across repeated kicks, ITI is an index of impulse transfer rather than effective (inertial) mass; front kick assessment in soldiers should include representative military equipment, and the altered kick mechanics suggest that training should include it as well.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sports
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14110513
Primary Topic
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Contact-Integrated Impulse-Transfer Index for Front Kicks Under a Carried-Load Condition in Military Cadets

Tomáš Novohradský, Vladimír Hojka, Vladan Oláh, Jan Maleček et al.
1 links
Sports
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
article

A Contact-Integrated Impulse-Transfer Index for Front Kicks Under a Carried-Load Condition in Military Cadets

Tomáš Novohradský, Vladimír Hojka, Vladan Oláh, Jan Maleček, Petr Šťastný, Michal Vágner, Jachym Simsa, Václav Zdražila, Michal Punčochář
article en

Abstract

Effective mass reflects the body mass mechanically coupled during impact. Acceleration-based effective-mass estimates require noise-sensitive differentiation of segment kinematics. This study introduced a new operational index, the contact-integrated impulse-transfer index (ITI; the ratio of contact impulse to pre-impact foot velocity) and evaluated its reliability, agreement with an acceleration-based effective-mass estimate (Me,acc), and sensitivity to a carried-load condition. Forty male military cadets performed five maximal front kicks onto a force plate synchronized with three-dimensional motion capture under two fixed-order conditions: barefoot without load and with 30 kg of carried equipment. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients; condition differences using paired tests with effect sizes and false-discovery-rate correction; method agreement using correlations, ICCs, and Bland–Altman analysis; and isokinetic strength interactions using body-mass-adjusted mixed-effects models. ITI showed poor-to-moderate single-kick reliability (ICC = 0.46–0.52) but good reliability for the five-kick mean (ICC = 0.83–0.87). It was higher with than without the carried load (26.18 ± 5.20 vs. 21.72 ± 5.05 kg; p < 0.001; dz = 1.07), which, by definition, corresponded to a 23% greater net impulse with unchanged pre-impact foot velocity. Net impulse alone was more reliable (single-kick ICC = 0.75; five-kick mean ICC = 0.95) and showed a larger load effect (dz = 1.39) than ITI. Contact duration increased, peak force decreased, and the force–time profile appeared more push-like under load. In a subsample with usable impact-phase marker trajectories (n = 20), ITI and Me,acc were not significantly correlated (r = 0.06, p = 0.69) and showed negligible agreement (ICC = 0.01; Bland–Altman bias = −20.6 kg). The condition × strength interactions for concentric hip-rotator strength did not remain significant after Bonferroni correction (adjusted p = 0.067–0.096). Averaged across repeated kicks, ITI is an index of impulse transfer rather than effective (inertial) mass; front kick assessment in soldiers should include representative military equipment, and the altered kick mechanics suggest that training should include it as well.

SportsVol. 14(11)
Good health and well-being
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon