A multimodal manual therapy, exercise, and psychological intervention for painful diabetic neuropathy: the NeuOst feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Introduction: People with painful diabetic neuropathy lack effective and tolerable treatments. Physical and psychological interventions may help but require further study and combination to maximise effects. Objectives: This single-site, 3-arm, parallel, randomised feasibility trial tested whether a multimodal intervention combining manual therapy, exercise, and psychologically informed conversations ("NeuOst") was feasible, and a full-scale trial possible. Methods: Adults with painful diabetic neuropathy were randomised 1:1:1 to either (1) 5 individual sessions of NeuOst, (2) 5 sessions of a high-similarity control intervention with the same osteopaths, or (3) usual care. Allocation was computer-generated, and blinding was intended for assessors, research and administrative staff, and participants receiving NeuOst or the high-similarity control intervention. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed using predefined criteria. Exploratory clinical outcomes included pain, disability, and quality of life, collected up to 16 weeks post-randomisation. Results: Thirty-six participants were randomised; targets were met for eligibility (64%), consent (88%), retention (89%), blinding, fidelity, data completeness, and acceptability. Mean NeuOst session attendance was 82%, and satisfaction was high (mean 4.8/5). No serious adverse reactions occurred. Minor adverse responses were reported by 25% of NeuOst and 42% of control intervention participants. Recruitment rates indicated that modified procedures would be needed for a larger trial. Clinical outcomes were uncertain compared with control and promising compared with usual care. Conclusion: The NeuOst intervention was safe, acceptable, and feasible. The trial design proved largely workable, with areas for refinement identified. Findings support progression to an effectiveness trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pr9.0000000000001498
Primary Topic
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A multimodal manual therapy, exercise, and psychological intervention for painful diabetic neuropathy: the NeuOst feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Esther M Williamson, Whitney Scott, Nuno Koch Esteves, Sam Tan et al.
PubMed
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
article

A multimodal manual therapy, exercise, and psychological intervention for painful diabetic neuropathy: the NeuOst feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Esther M Williamson, Whitney Scott, Nuno Koch Esteves, Sam Tan, Jan David Wandrey, Philip Bright, Elizabeth Pigott, David Hohenschurz‐Schmidt, Jerry Draper‐Rodi, Matthew C. Evans, Jan Vollert, Andrew S.C. Rice, Sasha Smith, David W. Evans, Esther Miriam Pogatzki-Zahn, Annina B Schmid, Suzie Cro, Siobhán Stynes, Steven Vogel, Harriet Kemp
article en

Abstract

Introduction: People with painful diabetic neuropathy lack effective and tolerable treatments. Physical and psychological interventions may help but require further study and combination to maximise effects. Objectives: This single-site, 3-arm, parallel, randomised feasibility trial tested whether a multimodal intervention combining manual therapy, exercise, and psychologically informed conversations ("NeuOst") was feasible, and a full-scale trial possible. Methods: Adults with painful diabetic neuropathy were randomised 1:1:1 to either (1) 5 individual sessions of NeuOst, (2) 5 sessions of a high-similarity control intervention with the same osteopaths, or (3) usual care. Allocation was computer-generated, and blinding was intended for assessors, research and administrative staff, and participants receiving NeuOst or the high-similarity control intervention. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed using predefined criteria. Exploratory clinical outcomes included pain, disability, and quality of life, collected up to 16 weeks post-randomisation. Results: Thirty-six participants were randomised; targets were met for eligibility (64%), consent (88%), retention (89%), blinding, fidelity, data completeness, and acceptability. Mean NeuOst session attendance was 82%, and satisfaction was high (mean 4.8/5). No serious adverse reactions occurred. Minor adverse responses were reported by 25% of NeuOst and 42% of control intervention participants. Recruitment rates indicated that modified procedures would be needed for a larger trial. Clinical outcomes were uncertain compared with control and promising compared with usual care. Conclusion: The NeuOst intervention was safe, acceptable, and feasible. The trial design proved largely workable, with areas for refinement identified. Findings support progression to an effectiveness trial.

PubMedVol. 11(5)
St Thomas' Hospital (GB), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Health Sciences University (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Charing Cross Hospital (GB), University College of Osteopathy (GB), John Radcliffe Hospital (GB), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), University of Oxford (GB), University Hospital Münster (DE), Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of Southampton (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Keele University (GB), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of Birmingham (GB)
AstraZeneca, Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Royal British Legion, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Wellcome Trust, Hospital for Special Surgery, European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Imperial College London, King's College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, United Arab Emirates University, European Society of Anaesthesiology, Versus Arthritis, Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss, Berlin Institute of Health, Medical Research Council, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.