Prognostic impact of surgical resection after chemotherapy in oligometastatic versus non-oligometastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection following chemotherapy has been considered a potentially effective strategy for improving survival in patients with stage IV gastric cancer. Recently, the concept of oligometastasis has gained increasing attention. However, the prognostic significance of surgical resection according to oligometastatic status remains unclear, particularly in comparison with non-oligometastatic disease. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 249 patients with stage IV gastric cancer who received systemic chemotherapy. Patients were classified into an oligometastatic group (n = 52) or a non-oligometastatic group (n = 197) based on the extent of distant metastases. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed according to metastatic status and the performance of surgical resection. RESULTS: Surgical resection after chemotherapy was performed in 27 (52%) patients in the oligometastatic group and in 47 (24%) patients in the non-oligometastatic group, with a significantly higher rate of surgery in the oligometastatic group (p < 0.01). Median OS was significantly longer in the oligometastatic group than in the non-oligometastatic group (p < 0.01). OS was significantly better in patients who underwent surgery after chemotherapy than in those who did not (p < 0.01). However, among patients who underwent surgery, there was no significant difference in OS between the oligometastatic and non-oligometastatic groups (p = 0.29). Multivariate analysis identified peritoneal metastasis and surgical resection as independent prognostic factors (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Favorable survival outcomes were observed in patients with oligometastatic gastric cancer and in selected patients with non-oligometastatic disease without peritoneal metastasis who underwent surgical resection after chemotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-026-03238-1
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Prognostic impact of surgical resection after chemotherapy in oligometastatic versus non-oligometastatic gastric cancer

Kenji Baba, Yota Kawasaki, Takaaki Arigami, Daisuke Matsushita et al.
International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Prognostic impact of surgical resection after chemotherapy in oligometastatic versus non-oligometastatic gastric cancer

Kenji Baba, Yota Kawasaki, Takaaki Arigami, Daisuke Matsushita, Masataka Shimonosono, Takao Ohtsuka, Keishi Okubo, Masahiro Noda, Ken Sasaki
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection following chemotherapy has been considered a potentially effective strategy for improving survival in patients with stage IV gastric cancer. Recently, the concept of oligometastasis has gained increasing attention. However, the prognostic significance of surgical resection according to oligometastatic status remains unclear, particularly in comparison with non-oligometastatic disease. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 249 patients with stage IV gastric cancer who received systemic chemotherapy. Patients were classified into an oligometastatic group (n = 52) or a non-oligometastatic group (n = 197) based on the extent of distant metastases. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed according to metastatic status and the performance of surgical resection. RESULTS: Surgical resection after chemotherapy was performed in 27 (52%) patients in the oligometastatic group and in 47 (24%) patients in the non-oligometastatic group, with a significantly higher rate of surgery in the oligometastatic group (p < 0.01). Median OS was significantly longer in the oligometastatic group than in the non-oligometastatic group (p < 0.01). OS was significantly better in patients who underwent surgery after chemotherapy than in those who did not (p < 0.01). However, among patients who underwent surgery, there was no significant difference in OS between the oligometastatic and non-oligometastatic groups (p = 0.29). Multivariate analysis identified peritoneal metastasis and surgical resection as independent prognostic factors (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Favorable survival outcomes were observed in patients with oligometastatic gastric cancer and in selected patients with non-oligometastatic disease without peritoneal metastasis who underwent surgical resection after chemotherapy.

International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Kagoshima University (JP)
Kagoshima University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon